TITLE

A Productivity and Cost Comparison of Two Systems for Producing Biomass Fuel from Roadside Forest Treatment Residues

AUTHOR(S)
Anderson, Nathaniel; Woodam Chung; Loeffler, Dan; Jones, John Greg
PUB. DATE
March 2012
SOURCE
Forest Products Journal;Mar2012, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p222
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Forest operations generate large quantities of forest biomass residues that can be used for production of bioenergy and bioproducts. However, a significant portion of recoverable residues are inaccessible to large chip vans, making use financially infeasible. New production systems must be developed to increase productivity and reduce costs to facilitate use of these materials. We present a comparison of two alternative systems to produce biomass fuel (i.e., ''hog fuel'') from forest residues that are inaccessible to chip vans: (1) forwarding residues in fifth-wheel end-dump trailers to a concentration yard, where they can be stored and then ground directly into chip vans, and (2) grinding residues on the treatment unit and forwarding the hog fuel in high-sided dump trucks to a concentration yard, where it can be stored and then reloaded into chip vans using a frontend loader. To quantify the productivity and costs of these systems, work study data were collected for both systems on the same treatment unit in northern Idaho in July 2009. With standard machine rate calculations, the observed costs from roadside to loaded chip van were $23.62 per bone dry ton (BDT) for slash forwarding and $24.52 BDT-1 for in-woods grinding. Results indicate that for harvest units with conditions similar to the test area, slash forwarding is most appropriate for sites with dispersed residues and long-distance in-woods grinder mobilization. For sites with densely piled roadside residues, in-wood grinding is likely to be a more productive and less costly option for residue recovery.
ACCESSION #
85218969

 

Related Articles

  • Power to the people.  // Forestry & British Timber;Aug2003, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p6 

    Reports on a biomass project that make use of woodchip-fuelled system to heat local establishments in Kielder, England. Goals of the project; Support of woodchip suppliers for the project.

  • Better Fuel From Wood Waste.  // New Zealand Forest Industries;Jul2003, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p39 

    Discusses the use of sawdust as biofuel. Conversion of sawdust into pellets; Solution to waste disposal problem; Reduction in energy costs.

  • Wood waste technology demand way ahead of supply. Ross, Ian // Northern Ontario Business;Jun2006, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p31 

    The article reports on the efforts of David Deyoe to promote the use of wood waste as fuel in Northern Ontario. Deyoe is a senior biotechnology adviser at the Ministry of Natural Resources. He has delivered presentations about the emerging economic trends in using forest biomass for fuel....

  • STUDY CONNECTED WITH WOOD RESIDUES BEHAVIOUR DURING ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION PROCESS. Cioabla, Adrian Eugen; Ionel, Ioana; Popescu, Francisc // Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ);Oct2010, Vol. 9 Issue 10, p1411 

    In Europe, biomass represents an important renewable source, sharing the highest percentage (61.4 %), followed by hydro power with 31.9 %. Other energy resources, namely wind, geothermal and solar, taken together, stand for only 6.7%. Romania has a high biomass energy potential, estimated at...

  • Effective production of ethanol-from-cellulose (EFC) from cheap sources sawdust and seaweed Gracilaria edulis. Amanullah, Thoufik Rahuman; Krishnan, Deepu; Senthil Balaji, D.; Ganesan, Karthikeyan; Anand, Bibin. G.; Barthelomai, Infant Santhose; Ravichandran, Balaji; Chinnasamy, Sathish Kumar // Advances in Applied Science Research;2013, Vol. 4 Issue 5, p213 

    Ethanol-from-cellulose (EFC) holds great potential due to the widespread availability, abundance, and relatively low cost of cellulosic materials. Ethanol can be made synthetically from petroleum or by microbial conversion of biomass materials through fermentation. In early years the ethanol was...

  • Bioenergy Gets a Boost.  // New Zealand Forest Industries;Jul2003, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p16 

    Explores the use of bioenergy as an alternative source of heat production for the wood processing industry in New Zealand. Increase in energy costs; Burning of wood waste to release biomass; Comparison of base heating costs of biomass with coal, gas and geothermal plant; Wood processing firms...

  • Forest Biomass Harvesting in the Northeast: A Special-Needs Operation? Benjamin, Jeffrey G.; Lilieholm, Robert J.; Coup, Charles E. // Northern Journal of Applied Forestry;Jun2010, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p45 

    There is growing interest in harvesting forest biomass to meet the needs of bioenergy and bioproducts facilities in the Northeast. This interest is accompanied by increased concern over the potential impacts of biomass removals on forest ecosystems. Debates over biomass proposals have revealed a...

  • ALTERNATIVE FUELS. Francey, Sabrina; Honghi Tran; Jones, Andrew // Paper 360;Oct2009, Vol. 4 Issue 8, p20 

    The article offers a research paper which examines the technical feasibility of alternative fuels that include petroleum coke, wood residues, and olein biofuel. It mentions that paper mills must find more economical fuel alternatives due to the steady increase in energy costs. It is stated that...

  • Waste wood: branching out into biomass.  // Local Authority Waste & Recycling;Jun2008, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p14 

    The article addresses the increasing use of waste wood as a biomass fuel source. Waste wood was named as a priority material for action in the Waste Strategy for England 2007. The main approaches for recovery or disposal of waste wood are recycling, energy recovery/incineration, and landfill....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics