TITLE

The Constitutional Limits of the "National Consensus" Doctrine in Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence

AUTHOR(S)
White, Kevin
PUB. DATE
October 2012
SOURCE
Brigham Young University Law Review;2012, Vol. 2012 Issue 4, p1371
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the constitutional limits of the national consensus doctrine in relation to criminal sentences and the jurisprudence of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as of October 2012. The U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the Eighth Amendment is addressed, along with the court's views towards torture and excessive punishments. The national consensus rationale and its influence on the court's ruling in the case Kennedy v. Louisiana are also examined.
ACCESSION #
85034900

 

Related Articles

  • CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN KENNEDY V. LOUISIANA? RĂ©, Richard M. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2010, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p1031 

    The article focuses on the possibility that the Eighth Amendment jurisprudence is subject to federal legislative override as presented in the case Kennedy versus Louisiana. It states that in June 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Louisiana statute that made the rape of a child a capital...

  • SUPREME COURT FINDS AN INEXACT CONSENSUS TO SPARE CHILD RAPISTS: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF KENNEDY V. LOUISIANA. Fraser, Luke // Houston Law Review;Mar2010, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p215 

    The article examines the Kennedy v. Louisiana child rape case wherein five justices in the U.S. Supreme Court declared that death penalty punishment is disproportionate under the Eight Amendment. It explores the Supreme Court reasoning including that of Justice Kennedy's majority opinion and...

  • KENNEDY, KENNEDY, AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: "STILL IN SEARCH OF A UNIFYING PRINCIPLE"? Raeker-Jordan, Susan // University of Pittsburgh Law Review;2011, Vol. 73 Issue 1, p107 

    The article discusses the protections against the imposition of cruel and unusual punishments under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Louisiana which deals with a reportedly unconstitutional state law which imposes the death penalty...

  • Victims and the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence in Miller v. Alabama: A Tale of a Constitutive Paradox for Victims. Garvin, Meg // New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement;Spring2013, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p303 

    "Law is most usefully seen ... as a branch of rhetoric; and that the kind of rhetoric of which law is a species is most usefully seen not, as rhetoric usually is, either as a failed science or as the ignoble art of persuasion, but as the central art by which community and culture are...

  • The Privatization of Prisons and Prisoner Healthcare: Addressing the Extent of Prisoners' Right to Healthcare. Bondurant, Brittany // New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement;Spring2013, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p407 

    The following are tragic stories of prisoners subjected to irresponsible privatized healthcare companies, along with the many cases of neglect that have been deliberated by the United States Supreme Court. This Note concerns the privatization of healthcare within the nation's prison systems, and...

  • EXTENDING HOPE INTO "THE HOLE": APPLYING GRAHAM V. FLORIDA TO SUPERMAX PRISONS. Allen, Joseph B. // William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal;Oct2011, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p217 

    The article discusses the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case Graham v. Florida and its impact upon so-called supermax prison facilities. The author argues that the reach of the U.S. Constitution's cruel and unusual punishment clause be expanded in order to bar prolonged detentions in...

  • Supreme Quotes. Roth, Evan J. // Maine Bar Journal;Winter2013, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p53 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Glass v. Louisiana, in which plaintiff Jimmy Glass was sentenced to death by electrocution. It describes Justice William J. Brennan's dissent regarding the Court's decision, wherein electrocution was held unconstitutional and "cruel and unusual...

  • STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT. FARRELL, IAN P. // Florida State University Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p853 

    The article discusses the strict scrutiny standard of judicial review in relation to the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as of July 2013, focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court (USSC) and legal protections against cruel and unusual punishment in America. The USSC's reported reliance on...

  • GRAHAM'S APPLICABILITY TO TERM-OF-YEARS SENTENCES AND MANDATE TO PROVIDE A "MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY" FOR RELEASE. SCHLESSEL, KRISZTINA // Florida State University Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p1027 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's (USSC's) ruling in the 2010 case Graham v. Florida, focusing on the Eighth Amendment to the nation's Constitution, as well as the potential applicability of the court's decision in the Graham case to term-of-years sentences and juvenile offenders....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics