TITLE

Is a Cementless Dual Mobility Socket in Primary THA a Reasonable Option?

AUTHOR(S)
Hamadouche, Moussa; Arnould, Hervé; Bouxin, Bertrand
PUB. DATE
November 2012
SOURCE
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Nov2012, Vol. 470 Issue 11, p3048
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Dislocation after THA continues to be relatively common. Dual mobility sockets have been associated with low dislocation rates, but it remains unclear whether their use in primary THA would not introduce additional complications. Questions/Purposes: We therefore asked whether a current cementless dual mobility socket (1) reduced the dislocation rate after primary THA, (2) provided a pain-free and mobile hip, and (3) provided durable radiographic fixation of the acetabular component without any unique modes of failure. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 168 patients who underwent primary THA using a dual mobility socket between January 2000 and June 2002. The average age at surgery was 67 years. We assessed the rate of dislocation, hip function, and acetabular fixation on serial radiographs. Of the 168 patients, 119 (71%) had clinical and radiographic evaluation at a minimum of 5 years (mean, 6 years; range, 5-8 years). Results: A long-neck option left the base of the Morse taper uncovered in 53 hips. Four patients underwent revision for dislocation between the femoral head and the mobile insert (intraprosthetic dislocation) at a mean 6 years; all four revisions occurred among the 53 hips with an incompletely covered Morse taper. Conclusions: A current cementless dual mobility socket was associated with a pain-free and mobile hip and durable acetabular fixation without dislocations if the long-neck option was not used. However, intraprosthetic dislocation related to contact at the femoral neck to mobile insert articulation required revision in four hips. Surgeons should be aware of this specific complication. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ACCESSION #
82092168

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics