TITLE

The Applicability of International Law Standards to United Nations Economic Sanctions Programmes

AUTHOR(S)
Reisman, W. Michael; Stevick, Douglas L.
PUB. DATE
August 1998
SOURCE
European Journal of International Law;1998, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p86
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In the first half-decade after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the UN Security Council repeatedly decreed mandatory economic sanctions programmes under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Some of the programmes were severely criticized for their allegedly disproportionate effects on the populations of target states. The authors identify economic sanctions as a coerctve instrument and assess the applicability of international law standards, including the traditional criteria of necessity, proportionality and discrimination, to mandatory UN economic sanctions programmes. After an overview of the theory of economic sanctions and their place among strategic instruments of enforcement, the authors review the instances of mandatory UN economic sanctions programmes, assessing their effects on the populations of the target states and the extent of the Council's consideration of international legal norms in designing and carrying out sanctions. Concluding that the Council has given inadequate consideration to international law standards in implementing these programmes, the authors propose five legal principles for mandatory economic sanctions programmes: that highly coercive sanctions follow prescribed contingencies; that they be necessary and proportionate; that the sanctioners reasonably maximize discrimination between combatants and noncombatants; that sanctions programmes be periodically assessed; and that relief be provided to injured third parties.
ACCESSION #
80066280

 

Related Articles

  • ARE SMART SANCTIONS FEASIBLE? Tostensen, Arne; Bull, Beate // World Politics;Apr2002, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p373 

    Reviews the literature on the smart sanctions approach developed in the late 1990s in response to the failure of conventional sanctions and questions the efficacy of this instrument. Operational problems; Intricacies of the political processes of the United Nations Security Council.

  • Sanctions Against Rhodesia.  // Time;12/23/1966, Vol. 88 Issue 26, p31 

    The article reports on the sanction against Rhodesia by the United Nations (UN) Security Council. It states that the council declared an international embargo on 90 percent of Rhodesia's exports, forbade the UN's 122-member nations to sell oil, arms, motor vehicles or airplanes to the rebel...

  • Humanitarian Safeguards in Economic Sanctions Regimes: A Call for Automatic Suspension Clauses, Periodic Monitoring, and Follow-Up Assessment of Long-Term Effects. Geiss, Robin // Harvard Human Rights Journal;Spring2005, Vol. 18, p167 

    Focuses on the humanitarian impact of economic sanctions. Rules on the imposition of economic sanctions; Obligations of the Security Council in imposing economic sanctions under the United Nations Charter; Proposals to address the shortcomings of economic sanctions.

  • DEADLINE? WHAT DEADLINE?  // Current Events;3/5/2007, Vol. 106 Issue 20, p3 

    The article reports that the United Nations Security Council's deadline for Iran to stop its uranium enrichment program has expired on February 21, 2007. As stated, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had earlier responded to member nations by saying that he would stop his nuclear enrichment...

  • French twist. Stanglin, Douglas; Battaline, Michele // U.S. News & World Report;3/24/97, Vol. 122 Issue 11, p20 

    Reports that France has raised the idea of applying time limits to sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council. Strong opposition from American and British diplomats; Fear that time limits would seriously undermine the threat of international sanctions as a weapon against rogue states.

  • IRAN SANCTIONS VOTE COULD COME WEDNESDAY.  // Middle East Reporter (Daily Edition);6/8/2010, Vol. 191 Issue 4868, p1 

    The article reports that western nations are hoping that the United Nations (UN) Security Council will vote on a sanctions resolution for Iran's nuclear program.

  • Stand-off with UN continues.  // MEED: Middle East Economic Digest;11/21/1997, Vol. 41 Issue 47, p12 

    Reports that the United Nations (UN) Security Council was preparing to impose sanctions in Iraq on November 12, 1997, after Baghdad refused to discontinue its decision to expel U.S. members of the UN Special Commission on Iraq. Plan of action of the security council concerning Iraq.

  • UN adopts toughest Korea sanctions yet. SENGUPTA, SOMINI; SANG-HUN, CHOE // Telegraph (Calcutta, India);3/3/2016, p2 

    The article reports on a voting by the United Nations Security Council, which resulted to the approval of a draft resolution to adopt sanctions against North Korea, following the country's series of rocket launches, and discusses the involvement of the U.S. and China in this action.

  • Will Iran Sanctions Go Far Enough? Gvosdev, Nikolas // World Politics Review;4/16/2010, p1 

    The article focuses on the imposition of sanctions against Iran by the U.S. and Russia. It mentions the perceived formation of a new United Nations Security Council resolution. It says that U.S. President Barack Obama succeeded in getting the House and Senate to delay the finalization of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics