Guaragna, John M.
April 2012
Venulex Legal Summaries;2012 Q2, Special section p02
An overview of the articles related to intellectual property (IP) published within the issue of the magazine is presented, including best practices in dealing with IP crimes, the new landscape in patent damages law, and observations on the impact of the American Invents Act's joinder provision on patent litigation.


Related Articles

  • A TWIST OF TECHNOLOGY. Le Mesurier, Kristen // BRW;7/28/2005, Vol. 27 Issue 29, p18 

    Focuses on the implication of Steven John Grant versus the Commissioner of Patents on the protection of business systems in Australia. Details of the lawsuit; Plans of the Federal Court to increase the number of business systems that can be patented; Solicitation of patent protection for a...

  • FOREWORD. Thompson, Mazelle W.; DeSanti, Susan Stark // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Summer2004, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p857 

    Given the limits on Patent Office scrutiny of patent applications, one might hope that ex post litigation can fix at least the important errors. Unfortunately, the often grossly skewed incentives to challenge and to defend issued patents make this view too optimistic. Since litigation cannot fix...

  • The Ghost Is the Machine: Protection of Process Patents Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f). Bradley, Keith // Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal;Fall2006, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p123 

    The article discusses the protection of process patents under 35 U.S. Code § 271(f). It also reviews the history of § 271(f), focusing on four cases that were not covered by the section as declared by the Federal Circuit. The paper then introduces the concepts of category-neutral and...

  • STICKY KNOWLEDGE AND COPYRIGHT. Chon, Margaret // Wisconsin Law Review;2011, Vol. 2011 Issue 2, p177 

    Knowledge is sticky because it adheres to people along social routes, lodged within relational and collective modalities, as well as through copyright's proverbial fixed works that can be transacted more freely. Sticky knowledge may in fact constitute a much larger body of knowledge than we...

  • Senate patent reform bill gets mixed reviews from industry. McCarty, Mark // Medical Device Daily;6/11/2007, Vol. 11 Issue 111, p1 

    The article offers comments from industry experts on a provision in the U.S. Senate bill that would expand the time allowed to challenge patents. Chief intellectual property officer Bruce Bernstein asserts that the apportionment provision would encourage free riders and even existing licensees...

  • Patent Plaintiff Perils. Campbell, Cathryn // Bio-IT World;Jun2004, Vol. 3 Issue 6, p92 

    Cautions U.S. biotechnology companies regarding the risks associated with patent infringement lawsuits. Impact of a patent lawsuit on a patent holder; Factors that a patent holder should consider before filing a lawsuit against a patent infringer; Benefit provided by an issued patent in the U.S.

  • Find a formula to protect your ideas. Taylor, Mark // Computer Weekly;3/13/2007, p20 

    The article presents the author's views on patentability of computer software in Great Britain. He refers to European companies which do not appreciate that such patents are being obtained in Europe and are pressing ahead with software patenting strategies. He suggests that companies should take...

  • THE $83 BILLION PATENT LITIGATION FALLACY. KATZNELSON, RON D. // Regulation;Spring2016, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p14 

    The article discusses the limitations of the paper "The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls," by James Bessen, Jennifer Ford and Michael Meurer. It cites the paper's implication that patent owners who license their intellectual property (IP) are evil. Topics covered include the attack of...

  • A Patent Doctrine without Bounds: The "Extended" Written Description Requirement. Whitley, Guang Ming // University of Chicago Law Review;Spring2004, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p617 

    The article presents information on the patent doctrine in the United States. Valid patents must fulfill: "written description" and "enablement." Traditionally, the written description requirement served as a priority policing doctrine, preventing patent applicants from improperly amending...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics