Patent wars promote innovation

May 2012
Lawyer;5/21/2012, p14
Trade Publication
The article focuses on the 'patent wars' among corporations, which describes the disputes over patent ownership and infringement between technology companies such as Microsoft, Apple Inc., and Google. Information is provided on whether or not patenting stifles technological innovation and the need for essential patents.


Related Articles

  • Patent Infringement--The Doctrine of Equivalents Revisited. Silverman, Arnold B. // JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TM;Dec2006, Vol. 58 Issue 12, p72 

    The author reflects on an opportunity to consider infringement under the doctrine of equivalents provided in the U.S. if literal patent infringement is avoided through failure to satisfy each aspect of a recited patented claim. The doctrine of equivalents emphasizes that if someone avoids...

  • COMPARING PATENT LITIGATION ACROSS EUROPE: A FIRST LOOK. Graham, Stuart J. H.; Van Zeebroeck, Nicolas // Stanford Technology Law Review;Spring2014, Vol. 17, p655 

    Although patent litigation has become increasingly global, with litigants earning billion-dollar verdicts and seeking judgments in many different jurisdictions around the world, scholarship has been almost completely silent on how such litigation develops outside the United States. This void in...

  • Grace periods and patentability. Soames, Candi // Nature Reviews Drug Discovery;Apr2006, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p275 

    Recent patent case law has indicated that there is a trend for more experimental support in patent applications. However, having to publish such research could delay filing and undermine the novelty of the invention, whereas not publishing the work in a competitive research environment could...

  • THE PATENT PROFESSION AND THE GENERAL LAWYER. DAVIS, JR., ALBERT S.; STOWELL, HAROLD T. // Law & Contemporary Problems;Spring1948, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p310 

    The article offers information on the professionals dealing with the patents. It states that the professionals may include lawyers engaged in patent litigation, lawyers engaged in the solicitation of patents and non-lawyers engaged in the solicitation of patents. It mentions that the...

  • AVOIDING INFRINGEMENT OF OTHERS' IP.  // Chemical Engineering;May2008, Vol. 115 Issue 5, p33 

    The article focuses on the issue of infringement of patents in the U.S. The author suggests companies who are planning to enter in the carbon capture and storage (CCS) area to stay away from violating the patents of others. Furthermore, the author cited the U.S. law prohibiting the selling or...

  • FIXING NOTICE FAILURE: HOW TO TAME THE TROLLS AND RESTORE BALANCE TO THE PATENT SYSTEM. Rawls, Mark // William & Mary Business Law Review;Apr2014, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p561 

    Patent litigation has become more frequent, more uncertain, and more expensive. Much of this can be traced to the rise of patent trolls asserting vague and uncertain software patents. Trolls have been derided as bringing frivolous and vexatious suits against productive companies, sapping the...

  • What's Growing On in COURT JUDGMENTS.  // American Nurseryman;7/15/2005, Vol. 202 Issue 2, p12 

    Reports that the Federal District Court in Chicago, Illinois, has ruled in favor of Aquascape Designs Inc. for a patent infringement suit filed by the company against Stoney Creek Fisheries and Equipment Co. and Aspen Valley Landscape Supply Inc.

  • Mode, Method, Madness, and Mayhem: Section 15 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. Kalkwarf, Wayne A. // Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal;2013, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p271 

    The article discusses the significance of best mode doctrine as patents while examining the Section 15 of the U.S. Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. Topics discussed include the American patent law, encouragement of a patent applicant and impact of America Invents Act (AIA). Also mentioned are...

  • IN RE CURTIS.  // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Annual Review 2005, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p177 

    The article informs that the U.S. Federal Circuit held that when the evidence indicates persons having ordinary skill in the relevant art cannot predict the operability in the invention of any species other than the one disclosed, a patentee will not be deemed to have invented species sufficient...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics