TITLE

COSTLY Speech

AUTHOR(S)
Hansen, Mark
PUB. DATE
October 2002
SOURCE
ABA Journal;Oct2002, Vol. 88 Issue 10, p36
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses legal issues on political contributions and advertising in the U.S. as of October 2002. Civil fine paid by MSE Technology Applications Inc. for violating the laws on political contributions; Importance of establishing the client's goal for the political contributions; Discussion on the loophole in the campaign laws that in effect allows corporations to engage in political activities even though they are prohibited from making direct contributions to candidates.
ACCESSION #
7520573

 

Related Articles

  • Will Big Business Buy Elections? Mann, Dave // Texas Observer: A Journal of Free Voices;2/5/2010, Vol. 102 Issue 3, p2 

    The article reports on the ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court on January 21, 2010 regarding the ban on corporate campaign contributions in Texas and the U.S. It states that companies will be forbidden from giving contributions directly to election candidates, however, they would be...

  • Finance reform under fire. McConnell, Bill // Broadcasting & Cable;06/18/2001, Vol. 131 Issue 26, p41 

    Reports on the progress of legislation concerning campaign-finance reform in the United States. Debate over limitations on soft-money contributions and the banning of attack advertisements often purchased with them; Implications of soft-money limitations and attack ad bans for freedom of speech.

  • Senators call for free time. Albiniak, Paige // Broadcasting & Cable;09/15/97, Vol. 127 Issue 38, p18 

    Focuses on the letter sent by Democratic Party members of the US Senate to Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott asking the Senate vote on the campaign finance reform bill pending in the chamber which contains a provision that would give free airtime to political candidates. Features of the bill;...

  • D.C.'s Soft Focus. McClintock, Pamela // Daily Variety;2/12/2002, Vol. 274 Issue 53, p1 

    Reports on the cost of a reform bill on political advertising and soft money for broadcasters in the U.S. Expectation for the start of a slowdown; Estimated political advertising spending for 2002; Monetary damage of liberalizing candidates with lowest-unit-cost advertising.

  • Magic Words. Rosen, Jeffrey // New Republic;9/29/2003, Vol. 229 Issue 13, p16 

    At the Supreme Court, after a four-hour marathon of oral arguments about the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law --officially known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, or BCRA -- only one thing was clear: Unless the Court wants to reconsider three decades of its own precedents, it...

  • HAS THE TIDE TURNED IN FAVOR OF DISCLOSURE? REVEALING MONEY IN POLITICS AFTER CITIZENS UNITED AND DOE V. REED. Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1057 

    The article examines the campaign finance disclosure law following the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in cases Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) and Doe v. Reed from 2007 to 2010. It explores the hostility exhibited by lower courts between Wisconsin Right to Life II (WRTL II)...

  • Proliferating PACs. Jacobs, Charles // Central New Jersey Business;1/11/95, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p23 

    Criticizes the lower legal contributions individuals and corporations can donate to legislative candidates and political parties compared to law firms. Impact of the policy.

  • The outer limits of campaign reform. Carney, Eliza Newlin // National Journal;3/27/99, Vol. 31 Issue 13, p830 

    Focuses on the United States Congress proposal to increase the limits on political contributions. Scope of the law on campaign contributions; Reasons cited for the increase of the limit of contribution; Legislators backing the proposal.

  • House bans noncitizen campaign contributions.  // Human Events;05/01/98, Vol. 54 Issue 17, p23 

    Details United States Representative Douglas Bereuter's bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit noncitizens' contribution to election campaigns. Representative Joseph Knollenbergs support of the bill; Representatives who opposed the bill.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics