TITLE

Research on the Market Economy Model

AUTHOR(S)
Jian Zhang; Ning Zhao
PUB. DATE
April 2011
SOURCE
International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research;2011, Vol. 7, p106
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In order to promote China's market economy reform, it's necessary to study existing market models. This paper researched on three current typical market economy models, and mainly used normative analysis approach and comparative analysis method. Through compare three different economy models, this paper found two differences may lead to the diversity of model; however, they still have three similarities in different model, and the paper concludes that there are some basic rules must be obeyed in market economy. In the end, this paper puts forward some advices for China, so that central government can play positive role in boost market reform.
ACCESSION #
74203733

 

Related Articles

  • The transition to a market economy: Pitfalls of partial reform Murphy, Kevin M.; Shleifer, Andrei; Vishny, Robert W. // Quarterly Journal of Economics;Aug92, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p889 

    We present a theory of a partial economic reform of a planned economy, similar to the one that took place in Russia since 1988 and in China earlier In such a reform, some markets are liberalized in the sense that producers can sell output to whomever they want, including private firms, at free...

  • Escaping shock therapy. Weber, Isabella M // IPPR Progressive Review;Summer2019, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p99 

    An interview on the development of the Chinese economic model

  • Editor's Introduction. Hung-Gay Fung // Chinese Economy;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p3 

    Introduces a series of articles on economic reforms in China.

  • The China Puzzle: "Touching Stones to Cross the River". Nolan, Peter // Challenge (05775132);Jan/Feb94, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p25 

    The article examines China's approach to post-Stalinist economic reforms. Market socialism was the overarching philosophy of the Chinese economic system in the 1980s, though the term "socialist market economy" was not enunciated formally as the guiding principle of economic organization until as...

  • The snake and the hedgehog. Nolan, Peter // New Statesman;1/1/2005, Vol. 134 Issue 4720, p24 

    Examines economic polices in China as of January 1, 2005. Report that China's economy has grown significantly since the 1970's; Debate among Chinese leaders and scholars on the issues of globalization, transition, and development; Impact of a market economy in China that is integrated with the...

  • China's Growth Deceleration: Causes and Future Growth Prospect. Lin, Justin Yifu // Frontiers of Economics in China;Mar2019, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p26 

    China's growth decelerated substantially after 2010. This paper argues that the main cause for the deceleration is external and cyclical, China has a potential growth rate of 8%, the economy has good investment opportunities and resources, and China is likely to achieve a medium-high growth rate...

  • Economic liberalization vs. political authoritarianism. Prybyla, Jan S. // World & I;Apr96, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p50 

    Highlights China's attempt to build a capitalist economy within a Leninist political power structure. Structural transformation of China's socialist economy in 1979; Restoration of price control in 1993; Causes of erratic economic liberalization trend; Success in raising material welfare;...

  • China Securities Journal: Three Major Challenges for China's Economic Reform.  // Chinascope;May/Jun2014, Issue 69, p34 

    The article focuses on an article published by "China Securities Journal" on May 13, 2014, which listed three major challenges for China's economic reform.

  • POLEMIC OF N.F. DANIELSON AND V.I. LENIN ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA DURING POST-REFORM PERIOD. Andreevna, Gavrisenko Elena // Theory & Practice of Social Development;2013, Issue 2, p1 

    The research studies and compares conceptions of N.F. Danielson and V.I. Lenin on the key features of the economic development of Russia in 1870-1880-s and their attitude to capitalism. The author concludes that Lenin's position is more realistic, but his criticism is not substantiated enough.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics