Informed desire and the ambitions of libertarian paternalism

Qizilbash, Mozaffar
April 2012
Social Choice & Welfare;Apr2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p647
Academic Journal
Sunstein and Thaler's 'libertarian paternalism' (LP) is inspired by the findings of behavioural economics. Its ambitious policy agenda promotes interference which does not block free choice when agents fall short of fully informed and rational choice. Their implicit version of the informed desire view of welfare either provides no, or potentially erroneous, guidance to planners. LP thus faces significant implementation problems. To address these LP might adopt a weaker version of the information requirement on desires or an alternative view of welfare. Nonetheless, informational and bounded rationality considerations suggest that LP should be rethought and its level of ambition reduced.


Related Articles

  • Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles. Grüne-Yanoff, Till // Social Choice & Welfare;Apr2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p635 

    Libertarian Paternalism (LP) purports to be a kind of paternalism that is 'liberty-preserving' and hence compatible with liberal principles. In this paper, I argue against this compatibility claim. I show that LP violates core liberal principles, first because it limits freedom, and secondly...

  • Preferences and Subjective Satisfaction: Measuring Well-being on the Job for Policy Evaluation. Schokkaert, Erik; Van Ootegem, Luc; Verhofstadt, Elsy // CESifo Economic Studies;Dec2011, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p683 

    Behavioural welfare economics has raised doubts about the use of revealed preferences as an indicator of �true� individual well-being. Subjective satisfaction (�happiness�) measures have become increasingly popular, as they seem to avoid paternalism while at the same time not...

  • How the market responds to dynamically inconsistent preferences. McQuillin, Ben; Sugden, Robert // Social Choice & Welfare;Apr2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p617 

    This paper responds to the 'soft paternalist' argument that the findings of behavioural economics make traditional objections to paternalism incoherent. We show that there is a normatively significant sense in which, even if individuals lack coherent preferences, competitive markets are...

  • Economics of paternalism: the hidden costs of self-commanding strategies. Salvat, Christophe // Journal of Philosophical Economics;Autumn2015, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p102 

    The paper proposes an economic assessment of paternalism by comparing different alternative responses to dynamically inconsistent behaviors consecutive to hyperbolic discounting. Two main types of action are possible, self-commanding strategies and paternalism. The first category includes...

  • Manipulability measures of common social choice functions. Smith, David A. // Social Choice & Welfare;1999, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p639 

    Abstract. All social choice functions are manipulable when more than two alternatives are available. I evaluate the manipulability of the Borda count, plurality rule, minimax set, and uncovered set. Four measures of manipulability are defined and computed stochastically for small numbers of...

  • The distribution problem and Rawlsian reasoning. Tungodden, Bertil // Social Choice & Welfare;1999, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p599 

    Abstract. The difference principle of Rawls has been wrongly translated in the formal literature on welfare economics and social choice theory. The difference principle is concerned with the welfare of the members of the least advantaged segment, and, thus, does not - as frequently argued -...

  • Toward general impossibility theorems in pure exchange economies. Kato, Miki; Ohseto, Shinji // Social Choice & Welfare;Jul2002, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p659 

    We study the possibility of strategy-proof and efficient mechanisms in pure exchange economies. In his remarkable paper, Zhou (1991) establishes an elegant impossibility result: there is no strategy-proof, efficient, and non-dictatorial mechanism in the two-agent case. He conjectures that there...

  • Social choice with analytic preferences. Breton, Michel Le; Weymark, John A. // Social Choice & Welfare;Jul2002, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p637 

    Arrow's axioms for social welfare functions are shown to be inconsistent when the set of alternatives is the nonnegative orthant in a multidimensional Euclidean space and preferences are assumed to be either the set of analytic classical economic preferences or the set of Euclidean spatial...

  • Multi-valued strategy-proof social choice rules. Ching, Stephen; Zhou, Lin // Social Choice & Welfare;Jul2002, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p569 

    In this paper we introduce a new definition of strategy-proofness for multi-valued social choice correspondences. We prove two Gibbard-Satterthwaite type results for strategy-proof social choice correspondences. These results show that allowing multiple outcomes as social choices will not...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics