TITLE

Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles

AUTHOR(S)
GrĂ¼ne-Yanoff, Till
PUB. DATE
April 2012
SOURCE
Social Choice & Welfare;Apr2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p635
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Libertarian Paternalism (LP) purports to be a kind of paternalism that is 'liberty-preserving' and hence compatible with liberal principles. In this paper, I argue against this compatibility claim. I show that LP violates core liberal principles, first because it limits freedom, and secondly because it fails to justify these limitations in ways acceptable to liberal positions. In particular, Libertarian Paternalists argue that sometimes it is legitimate to limit people's liberties if it improves their welfare. A closer look at the welfare notions used, however, reveals that they respect neither the subjectivity nor the plurality of people's values. Thus its justification of the liberty-welfare trade-off is not compatible with liberal principles. I conclude that to justify LP policies, one must appeal to traditional paternalistic principles-and thus, there is no categorical difference between 'libertarian' and other forms of paternalism.
ACCESSION #
73822569

 

Related Articles

  • Response to Klein. SUNSTEIN, CASS R. // Econ Journal Watch;Aug2004, Vol. 1 Issue 2, p272 

    The article presents a response to comments by Daniel Klein published in the August 2004 issue of the "Econ Journal Watch" on the article "Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron," by Cass R. Sunstein and Richard Thaler. The author rebuts Klein's suggestion that the authors are making an...

  • Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron: an essay in defence of liberty. Veetil, Vipin P. // European Journal of Law & Economics;Jun2011, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p321 

    Sunstein and Thaler's proposal for 'libertarian paternalism' in their paper titled 'Libertarian Paternalism is not an Oxymoron' (LPNO from here on) is based on the contention that paternalism is sometimes (1) inevitable and (2) non coercive, and (3) that individuals do not always make 'rational'...

  • Erratum to: Libertarian Paternalism: Leviathan in Sheep's Clothing? Henderson, David // Society;Jun2014, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p321 

    A correction to the article "Libertarian Paternalism: Leviathan in Sheep's Clothing?" that was published in the 2014 issue is presented.

  • Introduction. Grill, Kalle; Scoccia, Danny // Social Theory & Practice;Oct2015, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p577 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including libertarian paternalism, context-dependence, and individual liberty.

  • Informed desire and the ambitions of libertarian paternalism. Qizilbash, Mozaffar // Social Choice & Welfare;Apr2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p647 

    Sunstein and Thaler's 'libertarian paternalism' (LP) is inspired by the findings of behavioural economics. Its ambitious policy agenda promotes interference which does not block free choice when agents fall short of fully informed and rational choice. Their implicit version of the informed...

  • LIBERTARIAN PATERNALISM IS AN OXYMORON. Mitchell, Gregory // Northwestern University Law Review;Spring2005, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p1245 

    Discusses the implications of the use of libertarian paternalism by a government in regulating irrational behavior. Evitability of choice-framing paternalism; Background on a libertarian system of rights; Application of a libertarian approach to choice-framing paternalism to maximize liberty;...

  • Growing up. Heine, Lori // Liberty (08941408);Nov2010, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p20 

    The author describes libertarianism as a generous mature philosophy, assuming that most people are capable of recognizing a good argument and understanding the truth, giving the same degree of freedom to everyone even its enemies.

  • Reaction.  // Reason;Dec2014, Vol. 46 Issue 7, p8 

    The article presents an excerpt from Robert Draper's August 7, 2014, cover story in The New York Times Magazine about the ascendance of libertarianism in American political life.

  • The strategic inconsistency of Paretian liberalism. Gardner, Roy // Public Choice;1980, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p241 

    In this paper, the problem of the Paretian liberal is cast as a preference revelation game whose outcome function satisfies Gibbard's libertarian condition and strong Pareto optimality. Strategic consistency requires that the equilibrium of the game agree with the sincere outcome. It is shown...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics