TITLE

Efficient Uncertainty in Patent Interpretation

AUTHOR(S)
Surden, Harry
PUB. DATE
December 2011
SOURCE
Washington & Lee Law Review;Winter2011, Vol. 68 Issue 4, p1737
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Research suggests that widespread uncertainty over the scopes of issued patents creates significant costs for third-party firms and may decrease innovation. This Article addresses the scope uncertainty issue from a theoretical perspective by creating a model of patent claim scope uncertainty. It is often difficult for third parties to determine the legal coverage of issued patents. Scope underdetermination exists when the words of a patent claim are capable of a broad range of plausible scopes ex ante in light of the procedures for interpreting patents. Underdetermination creates uncertainty about claim coverage because a lay interpreter cannot know which interpretation will ultimately be elected and employed by a judge or jury in a patent infringement proceeding. This Article models this uncertainty problem by the set of interpretations that are plausible for a patent-claim element in light of constraints that restrict meaning, internal and external to the patent document. The model suggests generalizable properties against which we can critically evaluate patent interpretive rules and procedures. On this basis, the Article develops an approach to improving the ex ante scope precision of any given patent claim. The general approach is to reduce the set of interpretative scopes that patent claim words can plausibly obtain. By increasing explicit, scope-defining information in the public patent record, it is possible to improve scope precision by ex ante clarifying scope coverage and exclusion in foreseeable scope uncertainly scenarios.
ACCESSION #
72446813

 

Related Articles

  • A TWIST OF TECHNOLOGY. Le Mesurier, Kristen // BRW;7/28/2005, Vol. 27 Issue 29, p18 

    Focuses on the implication of Steven John Grant versus the Commissioner of Patents on the protection of business systems in Australia. Details of the lawsuit; Plans of the Federal Court to increase the number of business systems that can be patented; Solicitation of patent protection for a...

  • EDITOR'S COLUMN. Guaragna, John M. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2012 Q2, Special section p02 

    An overview of the articles related to intellectual property (IP) published within the issue of the magazine is presented, including best practices in dealing with IP crimes, the new landscape in patent damages law, and observations on the impact of the American Invents Act's joinder provision...

  • Patent Wars! Gustin, Sam // Time International (Atlantic Edition);4/23/2012, Vol. 179 Issue 16, p10 

    The article focuses on U.S. patent law and the acquisition of technology patents by large corporations such as the Internet search provider Google and electronics manufacturer Motorola. Topics include the meaning of 'patent trolling' and U.S. President Barack Obama's efforts to reform patent law...

  • Patent Wars! Gustin, Sam // Time;4/23/2012, Vol. 179 Issue 16, p16 

    The article focuses on U.S. patent law and the acquisition of technology patents by large corporations such as the Internet search provider Google and electronics manufacturer Motorola. Topics include the meaning of 'patent trolling' and U.S. President Barack Obama's efforts to reform patent law...

  • Patent Wars! Gustin, Sam // Time International (South Pacific Edition);4/23/2012, Vol. 179 Issue 16, p8 

    The article focuses on U.S. patent law and the acquisition of technology patents by large corporations such as the Internet search provider Google and electronics manufacturer Motorola. Topics include the meaning of 'patent trolling' and U.S. President Barack Obama's efforts to reform patent law...

  • Ghost of the Past: Does the USPTO's Scientific and Technical Background Requirements Still Make Sense? Blake, Corey B. // Texas Law Review;Feb2004, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p735 

    Discusses a proposal to broaden or eliminate technical background requirement for patent prosecutors in the U.S. Background on the patent law; Ways to reform the technical background requirement; Effects of the reform on patent cost, quality and members of the patent bar.

  • FOREWORD. Thompson, Mazelle W.; DeSanti, Susan Stark // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Summer2004, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p857 

    Given the limits on Patent Office scrutiny of patent applications, one might hope that ex post litigation can fix at least the important errors. Unfortunately, the often grossly skewed incentives to challenge and to defend issued patents make this view too optimistic. Since litigation cannot fix...

  • A Patent Doctrine without Bounds: The "Extended" Written Description Requirement. Whitley, Guang Ming // University of Chicago Law Review;Spring2004, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p617 

    The article presents information on the patent doctrine in the United States. Valid patents must fulfill: "written description" and "enablement." Traditionally, the written description requirement served as a priority policing doctrine, preventing patent applicants from improperly amending...

  • A patently unified Europe. England, Paul // Lawyer 2B;Winter2013, p9 

    The article discusses the Unified Patent Court (UPC) agreement and Unitary Patent in Europe. It reports on how the agreement would lead to several radical change to the system of litigating patents. It is informed that a single Unitary Patent will provide its holder with exclusivity protection...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics