TITLE

Groups Try to Cut Flow of Election Bucks

PUB. DATE
January 2012
SOURCE
Multichannel News;1/23/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p25
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which permits corporations and unions to fund electioneering advertisements for and against political candidates in the run-up to election primaries. As stated, decision was a financial boon to advertising-supported media. It reports that the Sunlight Foundation advocator of open government is proposing a modified version of the DISCLOSE Act to counter the Citizens United decision.
ACCESSION #
71700719

 

Related Articles

  • MONEY CHANGES Everything. EPPS, GARRETT // American Prospect;May2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p32 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010. It infers that the Court's ruling on corporate personhood has resulted in the use of large amounts of untraceable money for political advertisements. Critics...

  • TWO FAULTY ASSUMPTIONS OF CITIZENS UNITED AND HOW TO LIMIT THE DAMAGE. Ryan, Paul S. // University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p583 

    The article reflects on faulty assumptions of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which was regarding constitutionality of political independent expenditure by corporations. It explains how close relationships between political candidates and independent...

  • Citizens United v. FEC. Clift, Eleanor // NonProfit Times;4/1/2010, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p19 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on Citizens United v. FEC lifting the caps on the amount of money corporations and unions can spend to promote political candidates. It mentions supporters of the decision like Cleta Mitchell, a partner at the Foley & Lardner...

  • SUPREME COURT TO OK AL QAEDA DONATION FOR PALIN? Palast, Greg // Progressive Populist;2/1/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p13 

    The article reports on the would-be decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on corporate and institutional donations to political candidates. It mentions that the issue is whether corporations as an unnatural person can make contributions to political campaigns. It notes that the would-be ruling of...

  • Supreme Court Strikes Down Montana Law, Reaffirms Citizens United.  // New American (08856540);7/23/2013, Vol. 28 Issue 14, p8 

    The article reports on the reaffirmation of the U.S. Supreme Court decision for the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the case American Tradition Partnership Inc. v. Bullock. It says that the reaffirmation affected the law of Montana state that bans independent...

  • Spending Spree. Nicholas, Adele // InsideCounsel;Apr2010, Vol. 21 Issue 220, p18 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporate expenditure of independent political advertisements for candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment to the Constitution. In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the court decided...

  • Who Approves This Message? Shiffrin, Steven H. // Commonweal;2/12/2010, Vol. 137 Issue 3, p8 

    The article discusses the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission wherein Citizens United filed a suit in federal court seeking protection for the distribution of the film "Hillary: The Movie." The District Court ruled that airing the movie would violate 2 U.S.C. Section 441b....

  • Who's Your Donor?  // New Republic;11/11/2010, Vol. 241 Issue 18, p1 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of campaign funding in light of the "Citizens United" case adjudicated by the U.S. Supreme Court. The "Citizens United" case ruled that corporate and union funding of independent political advertising cannot be limited and is not subject to disclosure...

  • MILWAUKEE RADIO PUBLIC FILE DATA, 1998-2011: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ISSUE ADVERTISING AFTER THE BCRA AND CITIZENS UNITED. Terry, Christopher; Bard, Mitchell // University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy;Apr2013, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p157 

    An essay is presented on the political advertising on the radio with reference to the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission of the U.S Supreme Court. Topics discussed non-candidate political advertising on radio in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, impact of adoption of the Bipartisan...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics