TITLE

PREVENTIVE DETENTION DISTORTED: WHY IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO DETAIN IMMIGRANTS WITHOUT PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS

AUTHOR(S)
Chelgren, Whitney
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Loyola Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p1477
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
There are two main problems with the current immigration detention system: the conditions of confinement and the procedural mechanisms that are used to detain noncitizens. The current conditions of confinement cast serious doubt on the constitutionality of the detention system. Although it is purportedly civil immigration detention is very much a punitive institution. Moreover, there is no binding regulation governing the operation of detention facilities or the conduct of detention staff The problems that stem from this lack of regulatory oversight are compounded by the fact that many detention centers are run as for-profit businesses. More fundamentally, noncitizens are detained without the procedural protections that inhere in all other preventive detention contexts. Because there is no principled justification for this aberration, the constitutionality of the detention system is, at best, highly suspect. At a minimum, immigrants should receive pre-detention hearings to determine whether their detention is in the government's interest, and there should be time constraints imposed on pre-removal order detention.
ACCESSION #
70483401

 

Related Articles

  • DANGEROUSNESS ON THE LOOSE: CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS TO IMMIGRATION DETENTION AS DOMESTIC CRIME CONTROL. KREIMER, FRANCES M. // New York University Law Review;Nov2012, Vol. 87 Issue 5, p1485 

    The United States immigration detention regime that was reborn in the 1980s is not only unprecedented in scale, but also in rationale. Whereas immigration detention had historically been justified primarily as a means of ensuring immigration compliance, with a secondary purpose of protecting...

  • PREVENTIVE DETENTION DISTORTED: WHY IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO DETAIN IMMIGRANTS WITHOUT PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS. Chelgren, Whitney // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p1477 

    There are two main problems with the current immigration detention system: the conditions of confinement and the procedural mechanisms that are used to detain noncitizens. The current conditions of confinement cast serious doubt on the constitutionality of the detention system. Although it is...

  • Toward a Constitutionalized Theory of Immigration Detention. Silva, Travis // Yale Law & Policy Review;Fall2012, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p227 

    No abstract available.

  • PUTTING A HOLD ON ICE: WHY LAW ENFORCEMENT SHOULD REFUSE TO HONOR IMMIGRATION DETAINERS. AL-KHATIB, ALIA // American University Law Review;Oct2014, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p109 

    Beginning in the 1980s, immigration law began to place greater emphasis on noncitizens' past criminal convictions as grounds for deportation. This shift led to the deportation of many noncitizens with strong ties to the United States. In its effort to deport noncitizens with criminal...

  • Immigrants in Detention. Anderson, George M. // America;01/15/2000, Vol. 182 Issue 2, p13 

    Addresses the problem of immigrant detention in the United States. Information on the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act; Strategies suggested by participants in the Detention Watch Network conference on November 25 to 28, 1999 in Baltimore, Maryland; Source of support...

  • Immigration Enforcement: Better Data and Controls Are Needed to Assure Consistency with the Supreme Court Decision on Long-Term Alien Detention: GAO-04-434.  // GAO Reports;5/27/2004, p1 

    The U.S. Supreme Court's June 2001 ruling, Zadvydas v. Davis, held that indefinite detention of certain removable aliens was unlawful if their removal was not likely in the reasonably foreseeable future, even if they were deemed to be a threat to the community or a flight risk. U.S. Immigration...

  • Notes on Church-State Affairs: Rwanda. Hendon, David W.; Allman, Dwight D.; Greco, Donald E. // Journal of Church & State;Summer99, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p632 

    Reports that Roman Catholic Bishop Augustine Misago was placed in preventive detention until the Rwandan government can decide to try him for his role in the massacre of Tutsis in 1994. Details on his participation in the massacre of Tutsis.

  • Guantánamo: A sad anniversary.  // National Catholic Reporter;1/20/2006, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p28 

    The article looks into the fifth year of holding people at the Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, facility by the U.S. government. More than 800 detainees suspected of being terrorists have been incarcerated at Guantánamo Bay according to Human Rights First. The commissions do not use the same rules of...

  • Constitutional Avoidance, Resistance Norms, and the Preservation of Judicial Review. Young, Ernest A. // Texas Law Review;Jun2000, Vol. 78 Issue 7, p1549 

    Explores the canon of statutory construction of the United States that avoids constitutional doubts in cases under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). Sets of constitutional challenges to the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics