TITLE

THE INCORPORATION OF DEMOCRACY: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S PHILOSOPHY OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CITIZENS UNITED

AUTHOR(S)
Schaeffer, Jarrod L.
PUB. DATE
October 2011
SOURCE
Boston University Law Review;Oct2011, Vol. 91 Issue 5, p1783
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the judicial philosophy of U.S. Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy concerning the 2010 case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002. The author suggests that the Citizens United should be viewed as Kennedy's recognition of formal collective political expression.
ACCESSION #
67663949

 

Related Articles

  • McCain-Feingold AND FREE SPEECH: President Barack Obama and major media outlets have chastised the Supreme Court for its ruling overturning McCain-Feingold prohibitions on corporations airing political ads. Kenny, Jack // New American (08856540);3/15/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p10 

    The article discusses issues concerning the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn prohibitions on corporations airing political advertisements under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 or the McCain-Feingold Act. President Barack Obama castigated the Supreme Court for granting freedom...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune International (Europe);3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p50 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune;3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p72 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • No Middle Ground? Reflections on the Citizens United Decision. Bezanson, Randall P. // Iowa Law Review;Jan2011, Vol. 96 Issue 2, p649 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It comments on Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion, which states that corporations are First Amendment speakers. The implications of the Court's opinion that Justice Kennedy failed to...

  • Recalibrating Campaign Finance Law. Johnstone, Anthony // Yale Law & Policy Review;Fall2013, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p217 

    An essay is presented which provides a historical overview of America's campaign finance laws as of 2013, focusing on U.S. constitutional law and the potential recalibration of the laws which govern political contribution limits and political spending in the U.S. State laws and the U.S....

  • MILWAUKEE RADIO PUBLIC FILE DATA, 1998-2011: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ISSUE ADVERTISING AFTER THE BCRA AND CITIZENS UNITED. Terry, Christopher; Bard, Mitchell // University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy;Apr2013, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p157 

    An essay is presented on the political advertising on the radio with reference to the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission of the U.S Supreme Court. Topics discussed non-candidate political advertising on radio in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, impact of adoption of the Bipartisan...

  • Former Lobbyist Guts Campaign Finance Reform. CONASON, JOE // Progressive Populist;5/15/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p18 

    The article focuses on the role of Anthony Kennedy, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in the political campaign finance reform in the U.S. as of May 2014 as he has dismissed the notion that corruption will arise due to political campaign contributions in the Citizens United court case.

  • WHAT A DIFFERENCE FIVE YEARS HAVEN'T MADE: JUSTICE KENNEDY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 2007-2012©. Knowles, Helen J. // UMKC Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p79 

    This article shows that despite all the changes that have taken place on the U.S. Supreme Court during the past five Terms, what has not altered in any appreciable manner is the First Amendment free speech jurisprudence of Justice Kennedy. Several of Kennedy's colleagues have said that he has...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AND THE PARADOX OF "CORPORATE SPEECH": FROM FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION TO FREEDOM OF THE ASSOCIATION. Batchis, Wayne // Review of Law & Social Change;2012, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p5 

    The article discusses the decision in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC with a concept of speech in the First Amendment, and focuses the misguided nature of the Court's jurisprudential shift. Information on the history of the freedom of association jurisprudence and its common...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics