TITLE

Citizens United's Reshaping of 2012 Election

AUTHOR(S)
Roarty, Alex
PUB. DATE
October 2011
SOURCE
National Journal;10/29/2011, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the impact of changes in campaign finance regulations on the midterm election in the U.S. In its Citizens United decision, the Supreme Court has allowed unions and corporations to channel money into elections via their treasuries. The decision resulted to the advent of new political organizations not limited by the old fundraising regulations. Candidates are taking advantage of the changes by establishing super political action committees (PACs) and attending fundraisers.
ACCESSION #
67118824

 

Related Articles

  • Corporate Mischief. Becker, Joseph D. // Commonweal;6/18/2010, Vol. 137 Issue 12, p8 

    The article focuses on the illegal use of corporate treasury funds in elections in the U.S. The federal law does not allow the use of such funds for making direct contributions or expenditures in elections but the McCain-Feingold Law of 2002 expanded the prohibition by including public...

  • ON DEJUDICIALIZING AMERICAN CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW. Briffault, Richard // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p887 

    The article focuses on the importance to dejudicialize the American campaign finance law. It reviews the internal problems of the Supreme Court's the campaign finance doctrine as well as its inconsistencies and practical and theoretical difficulties. It discusses the corporation treatment,...

  • Citizens I – Citizens United O. SWEETE, ELIJAH // Moderate Voice;11/7/2012, p11 

    The article reports on the role by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United on the just concluded November 2012 election. It comments on the money spent by politicians in the election, which produced neither jobs nor wealth. It states that there are two ways to using the organization to...

  • IF NOT A COMMERCIAL REPUBLIC? POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE UNITED STATES AFTER CITIZENS UNITED. Westbrook, David A. // University of Louisville Law Review;Fall2011, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p35 

    The article discusses the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. According to the article, the Court ruled that a federal law regulating corporate participation in U.S. elections was unconstitutional. The article discusses political economy in the U.S. in...

  • When 'Free Speech' Becomes an Oxymoron. HALTOM, BILL // Tennessee Bar Journal;May2014, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p36 

    The article presents a humorous discussion on oxymorons in America as of May 2014, focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission which deals with Alabama businessman Shaun McCutcheon, contributions to political candidates, and free speech...

  • US Supreme Court strikes down overall donor limits.  // Chicago Citizen - Chicago Weekend Edition;4/9/2014, Vol. 44 Issue 14, p7 

    The article reports on the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the overall contribution limits for individual political donors as of April 2014.

  • US Supreme Court strikes down overall donor limits.  // Chicago Citizen - South End Edition;4/9/2014, Vol. 47 Issue 10, p7 

    The article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which lifts the overall contribution limits for political donors.

  • Continuing the Judicial Assault on Democracy. NICHOL, GENE // Progressive Populist;10/15/2013, Vol. 19 Issue 18, p9 

    The author criticizes the U.S. Supreme Court for considering abolishing the cap on political campaign contributions.

  • Left forgets that it likes free speech. LOWRY, RICH // Hill;4/ 7/2014, Vol. 21 Issue 43, p19 

    The author comments on the issues concerning the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down aggregate campaign donation limits.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics