TITLE

Evolution critics seek role for unseen hand in education

AUTHOR(S)
Gura, Trisha
PUB. DATE
March 2002
SOURCE
Nature;3/21/2002, Vol. 416 Issue 6878, p250
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the debate regarding the teaching of evolution and creationism in American schools in Cleveland, Ohio. Inclusion of 'intelligent design' in biology lessons; Protests of scientist; Views of Stephen Meyer and Jonathan Wells on 'intelligent design.'
ACCESSION #
6651572

 

Related Articles

  • Darwin's Hostages. Behe, Michael J. // American Spectator;Dec99/Jan2000, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p32 

    The article comments on the debate on evolution in the United States. Public reaction to the study and teaching of evolution in Kansas schools is commented on, and the reason for the popularity of debates on the Darwinian theory of evolution is explored. The author's opinion of the fallibility...

  • Evolution Debated Before Texas Education Board.  // NSTA Express;1/26/2009, p2 

    The article reports on the complaint filed by a group of experts and activists before the board of education in Texas over a policy that requires teachers to address the strengths and weakness of scientific theory in teaching evolution. Accordingly, the group noted that the use of the term...

  • Education's Missing Link: How Private School Teachers Approach Evolution. Schulteis, Michael w. // American Biology Teacher (National Association of Biology Teache;Feb2010, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p91 

    Over 5 million students and 28,000 schools are consistently marginalized or left out of statistics that describe evolution and science education. Although they are relatively few in number compared with their public school counterparts, the millions of students and hundreds of thousands of...

  • CREATIONISM AND BIOLOGY TEXTS. Goldstein, Lester // BioScience;Jun1983, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p356 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article by Wayne A. Moyer on the subject of biological evolution in high school textbooks in the February 1983 issue of the journal.

  • Untitled. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/21/93, Vol. 6 Issue 253, p22 

    Opinion. Compares parliamentary debaters in Great Britain and those in other countries. American legislators as the worst; Comments on speeches in Germany and Australia; Reasons for British brilliance in polemics; Politicians in Britain that are noteworthy.

  • Assessing the jurisdictional model of topicality. Murphy, Thomas L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p145 

    Examines the implications of topicality as a jurisdictional issue in debate. Definition of jurisdiction; Subject matter jurisdiction and the notion of guidance; Special appearance, waiver and reverse voting issues; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • The jurisdiction/topicality analogy. Madsen, Arnie; Louden, Allan D. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p151 

    Comments on an article by Thomas L. Murphy about the jurisdiction standard of topicality in debate. Relationship between topicality and jurisdiction; Responses to indictments of the jurisdiction model; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • Counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions. Ulrich, Walter R. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p154 

    Examines the counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions in debate. Domains of a resolution and topical counterplan theory; Topic selection as a selection of focus in the debate.

  • Hats off.  // New Hampshire Business Review;9/1/95, Vol. 17 Issue 18, p5 

    Reports on the debate at Salem High School, New Hampshire, regarding whether to ban all headgear in school for reasons other than religion, health or safety.

  • Evaluating student learning with mock debates. Nicaise, Molly; Brown, Jennifer // Contemporary Education;1997, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p131 

    Analyzes the role of mock debates in student learning evaluation. Benefits of mock debates; Improvement of communication skills, application skills and general knowledge; Description and purpose of mock debates; Determination of student understanding; Stress on the issues of cost and time;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics