Leiter on the Legal Realists

Green, Michael
July 2011
Law & Philosophy;Jul2011, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p381
Academic Journal
In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter's recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positions that distinguish Leiter's reading of the American legal realists from those offered in the past. The first is his claim that the realists thought the law is only locally indeterminate - primarily in cases that are appealed. The second is his claim that they did not offer a prediction theory of law, but were instead committed to a standard positivist theory. Leiter's reading is vulnerable, because he fails to discuss in detail those passages from the realists that inspired past interpretations. My goal is to see how Leiter's reading fares when these passages are considered. I argue that Leiter is right that the realists' indeterminacy thesis has only a local scope. Those passages that appear to claim that the law is globally indeterminate actually address three other topics: judicial supremacy, judges' roles as finders of fact, and the moral obligation to adjudicate as the law commands. With respect to the prediction theory, however, I conclude that Leiter's position cannot be defended. Indeed the realists offered two 'prediction' theories of law. According to the first, which is best described as a decision theory, the law concerning an event is whatever concrete judgment a court will issue when the event is litigated. According to the second, the law is reduced, not to concrete judgments, but to regularities of judicial (and other official) behavior in a jurisdiction. I end this essay with the suggestion that the realists' advocacy of the second prediction theory indirectly vindicates Leiter's reading of the realists as prescient jurisprudential naturalists.


Related Articles

  • Brian Leiter: Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Kramer, Matthew // Criminal Law & Philosophy;Jan2009, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p107 

    The article reviews the book "Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy," by Brian Leiter.

  • Naturalising Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Rodriquez-Blanco, Veronica // Mind;Oct2008, Vol. 117 Issue 468, p1091 

    The article reviews the book "Naturalising Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy," by Brian Leiter.

  • Naturalismo y quietismo. Rorty, Richard // Di�noia;may2006, Vol. 51 Issue 56, p3 

    Brian Leiter divides the English-speaking philosophical world into quietists and naturalists. The former consider philosophy as a kind of therapy, dissolving philosophical problems rather than solving them. The latter can be divided, according to Huw Price, into object naturalists, who think...

  • METHODOLOGICAL VERSUS NATURALISTIC LEGAL OBJECTIVITY. CHING, KENNETH K. // St. Louis University Law Journal;Fall2012, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p59 

    The article discusses the methodological and naturalistic conception of law and legal objectivity based on the writings by Judge Richard Posner and legal scholar Brian Leiter. It informs that the naturalistic approach to law and legal objectivity is based on the methods and results of empirical...

  • Hermeneutic Concepts and Immodest Conceptual Analysis of the Law. Sciaraffa, Stefan // APA Newsletters;Fall2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, Special section p18 

    The article addresses the challenge that Brian Leiter poses for conceptual analysis of the law (CAL) in the context of his larger project of naturalizing analytic jurisprudence. It refines Leiter's notion of a hermeneutic concept using Locke's discussion of archetype ideas. It explains by way of...

  • WERE THE LEGAL REALISTS LEGAL POSITIVISTS? Priel, Danny // Law & Philosophy;Jul2008, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p309 

    The author focuses on the arguments on legal positivism and legal realism of Brian Leiter. He states that in recent year in a series of article, Leiter has advanced a thesis that attempts to establish the relationship between realism and positivism. He mentions that the novelty of Leiter's...

  • Naturalism in Epistemology and the Philosophy of Law. Greenberg, Mark // Law & Philosophy;Jul2011, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p419 

    In this paper, I challenge an influential understanding of naturalization according to which work on traditional problems in the philosophy of law should be replaced with sociological or psychological explanations of how judges decide cases. W.V. Quine famously proposed the 'naturalization of...

  • On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become. Dickson, Julie // Law & Philosophy;Jul2011, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p477 

    In a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argued that certain theoretical strains in contemporary legal philosophy are 'epistemologically bankrupt', in virtue of their reliance on misguided argumentative devices: analysing concepts, such as...

  • WHAT'S SO SPECIAL ABOUT RELIGION? FIVE OR SIX ANSWERS. MCCLAY, WILFRED M. // Renewing Minds: A Journal of Christian Thought;Spring2013, Issue 3, p5 

    The article offers the author's insights on the importance of freedom of religion in the U.S. He offers six arguments as to why religion is important in the American life which includes the anthropological argument, meliorist, and metaphysical. The author adds that a special treatment on church...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics