TITLE

On Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Some Comments on Brian Leiter's View of What Jurisprudence Should Become

AUTHOR(S)
Dickson, Julie
PUB. DATE
July 2011
SOURCE
Law & Philosophy;Jul2011, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p477
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argued that certain theoretical strains in contemporary legal philosophy are 'epistemologically bankrupt', in virtue of their reliance on misguided argumentative devices: analysing concepts, such as the concepts of law and of authority; and doing so by appealing to intuitions regarding the correct way to understand the concepts in question. In response to this state of affairs, Leiter advocates that jurisprudence ought to attempt to catch-up with 'naturalistic' developments which have influenced the direction of other branches of philosophy - such as epistemology, philosophy of mind, and moral philosophy - in the last few decades. This article offers a critical analysis of some of Leiter's proposals for what Jurisprudence should become, in light of his views on the relevance of naturalism for this discipline.
ACCESSION #
65215730

 

Related Articles

  • Naturalism in Epistemology and the Philosophy of Law. Greenberg, Mark // Law & Philosophy;Jul2011, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p419 

    In this paper, I challenge an influential understanding of naturalization according to which work on traditional problems in the philosophy of law should be replaced with sociological or psychological explanations of how judges decide cases. W.V. Quine famously proposed the 'naturalization of...

  • Leiter on the Legal Realists. Green, Michael // Law & Philosophy;Jul2011, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p381 

    In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter's recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positions that distinguish Leiter's reading of the American legal realists from those offered in the past. The first is his claim that the realists thought the law is only locally indeterminate -...

  • Naturalising Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Rodriquez-Blanco, Veronica // Mind;Oct2008, Vol. 117 Issue 468, p1091 

    The article reviews the book "Naturalising Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy," by Brian Leiter.

  • Brian Leiter: Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Kramer, Matthew // Criminal Law & Philosophy;Jan2009, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p107 

    The article reviews the book "Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy," by Brian Leiter.

  • Hermeneutic Concepts and Immodest Conceptual Analysis of the Law. Sciaraffa, Stefan // APA Newsletters;Fall2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, Special section p18 

    The article addresses the challenge that Brian Leiter poses for conceptual analysis of the law (CAL) in the context of his larger project of naturalizing analytic jurisprudence. It refines Leiter's notion of a hermeneutic concept using Locke's discussion of archetype ideas. It explains by way of...

  • Is epistemic expressivism incompatible with inquiry? Carter, J.; Chrisman, Matthew // Philosophical Studies;Jul2012, Vol. 159 Issue 3, p323 

    Expressivist views of an area of discourse encourage us to ask not about the nature of the relevant kinds of values but rather about the nature of the relevant kind of evaluations. Their answer to the latter question typically claims some interesting disanalogy between those kinds of evaluations...

  • THE OBJECTIVITY OF MORALITY, RULES, AND LAW: A CONCEPTUAL MAP. Alexander, Larry // Alabama Law Review;2013, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p501 

    The article discusses the objectivity of morality, rules and law and explains that legal rules and decisions are metaphysically objective. It analyzes the challenges to the objectivity of legal rules and reflects on legal principles as the directly posited and as the joint product of legal...

  • Internalist and externalist aspects of justification in scientific inquiry. Staley, Kent; Cobb, Aaron // Synthese;Oct2011, Vol. 182 Issue 3, p475 

    While epistemic justification is a central concern for both contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science, debates in contemporary epistemology about the nature of epistemic justification have not been discussed extensively by philosophers of science. As a step toward a coherent account of...

  • A SWINDLE WITH BIG WORDS AND VIRTUES?: LETTER ON DWORKIN AND "NONSENSE JURISPRUDENCE". STOSTAD, TIMOTHY // North Carolina Central Law Review;2013, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p260 

    An essay is presented on the essay "In Praise of Realism (and Against Nonsense Jurisprudence)," by professor Brian Leiter, arguing that jurisprudence of professor Ronald Dworkin, which he calls moralist jurisprudence, is not relevant and illuminating in terms of law and adjudication. It argues...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics