TITLE

USERRA Does Not Provide Claim for Hostile Work Environment

AUTHOR(S)
Danaher, Maria Greco
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
HR Magazine;Jun2011, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p118
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the court case Carder v. Continental Airlines, in which the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the language of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) does not provide a cause of action for hostile work environment against military service members. The case stemmed from a group of Continental airline pilots alleged various violations of USERRA against Continental Airlines.
ACCESSION #
61867521

 

Related Articles

  • Court Affirms Denial of Severance Benefits.  // Benefits Magazine;May2013, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p62 

    The article discusses the case of Zieche v. Burlington Resources Inc. et al. involving severance benefits. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed the claims of breach of contract by the plaintiff. It also upheld its decision to deny severance benefits to the plaintiff after it...

  • Court Affirms Dismissal of Retaliatory Discharge Claim.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Nov2008, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p9 

    The article discusses the court case Kouvchinov v. Parametric Technology Corp. et al, in which the plaintiff sued the defendant for retaliatory discharge relating to the receipt of short-term disability benefits. The plaintiff's charges include Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974...

  • Courts say, 'Enough!': Employees must file all related claims at same time.  // HR Specialist: Texas Employment Law;Dec2009, Vol. 4 Issue 12, p3 

    The article discusses a court case Thanedar v. Time Warner Cable Houston, wherein the plaintiff filed a racial discrimination lawsuit against the employer Texas. It states that Indian descent plaintiff Chandrashekhar Thanedar sued the employer Time Warner Cable Houston after he was fired due to...

  • 'Get real' with job reviews; don't fluff them up.  // HR Specialist: Texas Employment Law;Jul2009, Vol. 4 Issue 7, p1 

    The article discusses the court case Lindy Watkins v. Paulsen filed at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the result of performance review. Watkins, who worked for the Department of the Treasury, filed a case claiming that her low performance review rate was due to race or sex...

  • Dealer Claims Casino Violated Title VII. Welfley, Jennifer Ann // HR Magazine;Jan2006, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p102 

    The article reports on the decision of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the case Jones v. Robinson Property Group. The court decided that witness accounts of a manager's racial epithets constitute sufficient direct evidence of race discrimination to defeat a summary judgment motion....

  • Plaintiff Ineligible for Severance Benefits.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Mar2007, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff negotiated his severance package after being laid off by his employer, the defendant. When the defendant's administration committee adopted a new severance plan, they denied the plaintiff's claim for severance benefits under the plan. The...

  • Plan Unreasonably Denied Claim Based on an Unsupported Interpretation of Customary and Reasonable Charges.  // Benefits & Compensation Digest;Dec2010, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p43 

    The article discusses a court case where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concurred with the district court's judgment which found the defendant benefit plan liable for costs and damages owned to a plaintiff hospital, the assignee of a participant's rights. The defendant refused...

  • Recent Rulings on Student Due Process Hark Back to 1970s. Black, Dennis // Student Affairs Leader;2/15/2011, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p8 

    The article examines the rulings of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on the two due process lawsuits involving students who were meted disciplinary actions by their schools due to conduct code violations in 2010. The first case involved a student of Texas Tech University (TTU) who...

  • Reimbursement Plan Is Not a Pension Plan.  // Benefits Magazine;Oct2011, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p61 

    The article discusses a case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that reimbursement for telephone expenses of certain retirees offered by the defendant is not a pension plan. In Boos et al. versus AT&T Inc. et al., the plaintiffs claimed that the reimbursement should be...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics