TITLE

Now you see it, now you don't

PUB. DATE
February 2002
SOURCE
New Statesman;2/11/2002, Vol. 131 Issue 4574, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Offers advice to the United States government on fighting a real war on terrorism.
ACCESSION #
6078716

 

Related Articles

  • IT IS TIME TO TEMPER OUR EXCESSIVE INTERVENTIONISM. Bandow, Doug // Naval War College Review;Autumn2002, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p76 

    Calls on the U.S. government to change its Cold War-era, interventionist strategy when handling the terrorist threats. Importance of thinking critically about the strategy against terrorism; Underpinnings of a more restrained and unilateral approach; Strategy that would reflect the reality of...

  • Reflections on a war of ghosts. Mishra, Pankaj // New Statesman;2/11/2002, Vol. 131 Issue 4574, p25 

    Comments on United States' attack on suspected terrorists in Afghanistan. Basis of the attacks in Afghanistan; Criticism on American intelligence agencies; View on challenging the authority of empires.

  • Proposed: A More-Effective and Just Response to TERRORISM. Cortright, David // USA Today Magazine;Jan2002, Vol. 130 Issue 2680, p10 

    Provides suggestions to the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush in its war against international terrorism. Important element for the success of the military response strategy; One cost of military campaign; Terrorists' way of defeating the U.S..

  • Not a Pretty Sight. Stokes, Bruce // National Journal;10/31/2001, Vol. 33 Issue 41, p3158 

    Discusses the importance for the United States to consider counter-terrorist techniques long employed by countries that successfully control domestic terrorism. Governments that have been fighting Islamic extremist for several years; Characteristics of each anti-terrorist techniques;...

  • Russians reflect on September 11 aftermath.  // Russian Life;Nov/Dec2001, Vol. 44 Issue 6, p6 

    Presents the results of a public opinion poll in Russia on the United States' actions against terrorism. Percentage of respondents supporting the US military operation against the Taliban; Reasons of the 57% Muscovites for not supporting the military actions; Potential effectiveness of the...

  • AMERICA and the War on Terrorism.  // Soldiers;Apr2002, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p10 

    Presents an update on the U.S. war on terrorism as of April 2002. Details on Operation Noble Eagle; Information on Operation Enduring Freedom.

  • Parlaying Tragedy into Empire. Swomley, John M. // Humanist;Sep/Oct2002, Vol. 62 Issue 5, p34 

    Comments on the U.S. war on terrorism following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Negative consequences of the war; Implication of the war on civil liberties; Drawbacks of the U.S. economic empire; Criticism on the U.S. government's stance on real or imagined terrorism threats.

  • Hunker Down for the Long Haul. Gingrich, Newt // American Enterprise;Jan/Feb2002, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p50 

    Comments on the United States (U.S.) government's war against terrorism following the September 11, 2001 tragedy. Kinds of opponents facing the U.S. on its war on terrorism; Approach that should be taken toward allies or foreign relations; Key elements needed for the success of the U.S....

  • TO DEFEAT TERROR, SEND IN THE DIRTY DOZEN. Wilson, George C. // National Journal;9/22/2001, Vol. 33 Issue 38, p2892 

    Focuses on the statement issued by United States (U.S.) retired serviceman and warfare expert James Guest in regard to the war on terrorism declared by the U.S. in September 2001. His opinion on the ability of trained military leaders; Criteria of troops required for the mission; Recommended...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics