TITLE

Supreme Court expected to overturn Wal-Mart ruling

AUTHOR(S)
GREENWALD, JUDY
PUB. DATE
April 2011
SOURCE
Business Insurance;4/4/2011, Vol. 45 Issue 14, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on an appeal ruling against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. which is expected to be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court. The appeals court ruling approved a massive class action lawsuit accusing the retailer of being involved in gender discrimination. In the case Wal-Mart Stores Inc. vs. Betty Dukes et al., the plaintiffs are seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, lost pay, and punitive damages.
ACCESSION #
60300092

 

Related Articles

  • The Walmart decision: Death of class actions?  // HR Specialist;Jul2011, Vol. 9 Issue 7, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes court case which deals with giant class-action lawsuits against employers. According to the article, the court ruled that a massive class-action suit on behalf of 1.5 million female employees cannot...

  • Class Certification after Wal-Mart v. Dukes. Prasad, Ashish // Pretrial Practice & Discovery;Fall2012, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p11 

    The article offers information on the decision held by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes and its impact on class action litigation in the U.S. in 2013. It states that various interpretations of the holding as it applied to class certification issues were made by...

  • Wal-Mart Class Action Certification Reversed. Deschenaux, Joanne // HR Magazine;Aug2011, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p18 

    The article provides information about the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court handed down last June 20, 2011 involving the class action suit filed by female employees of Wal-Mart for workplace discrimination in violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

  • Class Actions for Monetary Relief Under Rule 23(b)(1)(A) and (b)(1)(B): Does Due Process Require Notice and Opt-Out Rights? Klonoff, Robert H. // George Washington Law Review;May2014, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p798 

    The courts are in disarray regarding the due process rights of absent class members in mandatory Rule 23(b)(1)(A) and (b)(1)(B) class actions involving money damages. That confusion is the result of a series of Supreme Court decisions, culminating in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes in 2011, in...

  • 9th Circuit decision could green-light more class-action suits. Jones, Robert A.; Hall, Carolyn B. // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Jul2014, Vol. 8 Issue 7, p6 

    The article discusses the U.S. court case Stockwell v. City & County of San Francisco wherein the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the district court's ruling to deny a class-action lawsuit. It argued that the commonality requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure was met in the said...

  • What You Need to Know about Wal-Mart v. Dukes. Harvey, Stephen G.; Stio III, Angelo A. // CADS Report;Summer2011, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p5 

    The article discusses the 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes. Despite of the involvement of 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees in the case, the Court decided that it could not be certified as a class action lawsuit. According to the plaintiffs, the firm allegedly...

  • Wal-Mart Prevails Before U.S. Supreme Court in Discrimination Case. Ybarra, John A.; Wilder, Michael A. // Employment & Labor Relations Law;Fall2011, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p21 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a Ninth Circuit ruling on the certification of the plaintiff class under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a). In the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, the Supreme Court also ruled that the backpay claims were...

  • Introduction: Working Group on the Future of Systemic Disparate Treatment Law. Zatz, Noah D. // Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law;2011, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p387 

    The article focuses on the future of Systemic Disparate Treatment Law of the U.S. It discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. Dukes which focuses on judicial challenges of employment discrimination law. It provides information that the case involves class certification action which...

  • Court certifies class of brokers claiming race discrimination. Kozubek, Michael // InsideCounsel;May2012, Vol. 23 Issue 245, p68 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Supreme Court denied 1.5 million female employees alleging sex discrimination a class certification. It states that the ruling was made based on the findings that the company empowered local managers to decide on their staff's pay and promotion,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics