TITLE

MR. PRECEDENT

AUTHOR(S)
Mencimer, Stephanie
PUB. DATE
May 2011
SOURCE
Mother Jones;May/Jun2011, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p54
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents a profile of lawyer James Bopp, whose practice focuses on campaign-finance law. Bopp has been involved in prominent court cases including Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. His litigation in favor of removing campaign contribution limits and keeping the names of political donors secret is detailed. Bopp's strategy includes accepting many cases from small clients, increasing the likelihood of the U.S. Supreme Court accepting a case involving his issues. INSET: THE BOPP EFFECT.
ACCESSION #
60016686

 

Related Articles

  • Fighting Campaign Finance Reform. Kosterlitz, Julie // National Journal;9/5/2009, p5 

    The article deals with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to hold a rehearing of Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission on September 9, 2009, and its impact on the legal challenges against campaign finance laws filed by James Bopp. It outlines the arguments raised by Bopp against...

  • James Bopp Talks Campaign Finance. Roarty, Alex // National Journal;5/21/2011, p4 

    An interview with Indiana-based lawyer James Bopp, an adviser to the Citizens United legal case on campaign finance, is presented. When asked how the campaign finance laws have changed, he informs that U.S. courts will look more rigorously at government regulations. Bopp argues that the First...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune International (Europe);3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p50 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune;3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p72 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • Campaign Finance and Free Speech.  // Congressional Digest;Sep2010, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p193 

    The article examines campaign finance reform in the United States. The piece was written as a response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision "Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission." A number of topics are addressed including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 and the impact of...

  • Should Media Consultants Really Jump for Joy? D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p14 

    The article talks about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case of Citizens United and the potential response to media consultants to the decision. It cites several disadvantages such as the rise in expenditures, creating a strategic problem for candidate campaigns, more airway clutter, and...

  • Campaign Finance: Remedies Beyond the Court. Potter, Trevor; Morgan, Bryson B. // Democracy: A Journal of Ideas;Winter2013, Issue 27, p38 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on a case involving Citizens United and its impact on campaign finance in the country as of 2013. It states that the case and other subsequent ones led to an increase in the campaign funds. It mentions the narrow definition of corruption...

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...

  • SUPREME COURT TO OK AL QAEDA DONATION FOR PALIN? Palast, Greg // Progressive Populist;2/1/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p13 

    The article reports on the would-be decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on corporate and institutional donations to political candidates. It mentions that the issue is whether corporations as an unnatural person can make contributions to political campaigns. It notes that the would-be ruling of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics