TITLE

LETTER FROM THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

AUTHOR(S)
Howard, Robert M.
PUB. DATE
November 2010
SOURCE
Justice System Journal;2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, preceding p249
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editor discusses various reports published within the issue including one by Robert Hume on citations to law reviews in federal court opinions in the U.S., one by Udi Sommer on strategic use of docket control by Supreme Court justices and one by Lydia Tiede and colleagues on deviations from sentencing guidelines.
ACCESSION #
59338001

 

Related Articles

  • Age-Appropriate Charging and Sentencing. SCHWARTZ, ROBERT G. // Criminal Justice;Fall2012, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p49 

    The article discusses the charging and sentencing of juvenile offenders in the U.S. The American Bar Association (ABA) has been calling for sentencing of youthful offenders which considers their age and maturity. ABA calls for less punitive sentences for youthful offenders. In the case Miller v....

  • Nation's high court ends mandatory life without parole sentences for youth. Paredes Jr., Efren // Michigan Citizen;7/8/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 35, pA6 

    The author discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which abolished the life without parole (LWOP) sentences for the 2,500 prisoners across the country that will give courts the discretion to impose lesser penalties and consider age in giving sentences.

  • Nation's high court ends mandatory life without parole sentences for youth. Paredes Jr., Efren // Michigan Citizen;7/8/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 35, pA6 

    The author discusses the abolishment of the life without parole (LWOP) sentences for the 2,500 prisoners in the U.S. by the Supreme Court that will give the lower courts the discretion to impose lesser penalties and consider age in giving sentences.

  • EXTENDING GORE AND STATE FARM'S PROMISE OF FAIRNESS IN PUNISHMENT TO A CRIMINAL CONTEXT. Cordova, Ricardo N. // Drake Law Review;Spring2010, Vol. 58 Issue 3, p819 

    The article scrutinizes the judicial system in the U.S. pertaining to the fairness in prison sentences. It criticizes the inconsistent decision of the Supreme Court regarding the rigorous protection offered to civil dependants and the absence of safeguards for criminal offenders convicted under...

  • Sentencing.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;Mar/Apr2011, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p14 

    The article discusses several court cases on probation and sentences in the U.S. It examines the claim on error in the Criminal Punishment Code (CPC) sentencing scoresheet of the defendant, who was charged with lewd molestation of a 12-year-old girl. It explores the authority of a district court...

  • COULD OR MUST? APPRENDI'S APPLICATION TO INDETERMINATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS AFTER ALLEYNE. Loudon, David // National Lawyers Guild Review;Fall2015, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p161 

    The article discusses judicial discretion in sentencing and parole administration in U.S. courts. Topics covered include the definition of discretionary judicial sentencing system and determinate sentencing system, the application of the Sixth Amendment under the U.S. Constitution according to...

  • Giving It Another Shot: A Reexamination of the "Second or Subsequent Conviction" Language of the Firearm Possession Sentencing Statute. Moore, Rachel E. // Vanderbilt Law Review;Apr2011, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p1005 

    The article focuses on the reexamination of the second or subsequent conviction language of the firearm possession sentencing statute in the U.S. It outlines the passage of the statute as well as its application before and in the Supreme Court case Deal v. United States. It evaluates the...

  • WHEN AN OFFENSE IS NOT AN OFFENSE: RETHINKING THE SUPREME COURT'S REASONABLE DOUBT JURISPRUDENCE. Chiesa, Luis E. // Creighton Law Review;Apr2011, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p647 

    The article discusses the approach of U.S. Supreme Court towards offense, defense and sentencing factor tristinction. It explores the Supreme Court's conflation of the offense and defense distinction and examines the confusion regarding the offense, defense and sentencing factor tristinction...

  • Are Sentences Fixed by a Plea Agreement "Based on" a Guideline Sentencing Range and Thus Eligible for Modification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)? Berman, Douglas A. // Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases;Feb2011, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p217 

    The article discusses the court case Freeman v. United States, which involved the sentence modification provision under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The case argued whether a federal district court has the authority to lower the prison term of William Freeman convicted for crack offense...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics