TITLE

Strengthening EEOC Litigation

AUTHOR(S)
Slate, David L.
PUB. DATE
February 1984
SOURCE
Labor Law Journal;Feb84, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p67
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the impact of the quality of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's charge investigative process on the composition and quality of the commission's trial court litigation portfolio. Focus on the National litigation plan; Information on charge investigation initiative; Description of the Headquarters reorganization initiative.
ACCESSION #
5868069

 

Related Articles

  • Displacement of Incumbent Denied.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan76, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p62 

    This article reports on the decision of a federal court in the District of Columbia to deny the request of an African American applicant to oust a person hired for a desired position. The court ruled the applicant should receive prospective pay until another position became available. The...

  • What About Employee Suits?  // National Underwriter / P&C;3/7/2005, Vol. 109 Issue 9, p30 

    Reports that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 will not impacted on the pattern and practice lawsuits prosecuted by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission since such lawsuits are not controlled by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

  • Employee filed EEOC suit? Stifle your anger.  // HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law;Aug2009, Vol. 3 Issue 8, p1 

    The article offers tips on how to manage U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaint when an employee filed against the firm. It suggests not to let anger prevail as it may be another reason for further litigation. It cites an example of Mary Snow who worked for Subway...

  • Judge Clears FDIC Bias Cases to Continue. Adler, Joe // American Banker;9/15/2006, Vol. 171 Issue 178, p3 

    The article reports that a judge will allow six former U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) employees to seek claims stemming from accusations they were the victims of age discrimination in agency restructurings. During the 1990s, the FDIC instituted buyout programs to cut jobs and...

  • Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc. v. Atonio. Shaw, Bill; Moore, Gary A.; Braswell, Michael K. // Labor Law Journal;Mar90, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p183 

    The article presents the authors' views that the case of Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc. v. Atonio was wrongly decided in light of the legislative history and purpose of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Court's decision limited the landmark opinion of in the Griggs v. Duke Power Co. case. A...

  • STATEMENT DOES NOT BAR EEOC ACTION.  // Labor Law Journal;Feb76, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p98 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court denied review of the decision of the Sixth Circuit involving the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The appeals court held that a court-approved settlement of sex discrimination charges did not bar a subsequent suit by the EEOC...

  • Employer Had Constructive Knowledge of Illegal Status.  // Labor Law Journal;Mar90, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p191 

    The article reports on an administrative law judge's ruling on the case of U.S. v. New El Rey Sausage Co. The judge ruled that an employer will be considered to have reason to know that an employees' work authorization papers are invalid if a preponderance of the evidence shows that the employer...

  • equal employment opportunity.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug80, Vol. 31 Issue 8, p526 

    The article presents news briefs concerning equal employment opportunity in the United States. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has adopted less stringent requirements for deferring to state and local fair employment practice agencies. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the...

  • Job Agency Not FLSA-Exempt Retail or Service Establishment.  // Labor Law Journal;Jun73, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p381 

    The article reports on a federal appeals court in New Orleans, Louisiana's ruling on the case of Brennan v. Great American Discount & Credit Co. The court ruled that an employment agency cannot invoke the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) retail exemption to deny its own staff statutory wages or...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics