TITLE

Public Employee Labor Legislation: A Study of the Unsuccessful Attempt to Enact a Public Employee Bargaining Statute in Illinois

AUTHOR(S)
Clark Jr., R. Theodore
PUB. DATE
March 1969
SOURCE
Labor Law Journal;Mar69, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p164
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article presents the text of a speech given by Theodore Clark Jr. before the Western Region of the Public Personnel Association on March 26, 1968, which dealt with the enactment of the public employee bargaining statute in Illinois. In the previous years, Illinois, like other states, has been besieged by numerous threatened and actual strikes by its public employees. It was against this background of rising discontent on the part of many of the State's 400,000 public employees that led Governor Otto Kerner on July 26, 1966, to establish by Executive Order an Advisory Commission on Labor-Management Policy for Public Employees in order to consider all aspects of employee-employer relations for state and local governmental agencies and to make recommendations for such additional legislation as may be needed. The Commission, chairmaned by Martin Wagner, the Director the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations at the University of Illinois, was composed of 20 members representing all major interest groups. In addition, two Illinois legislators from each political party were appointed to the Commission. While each member of the Commission did not necessarily agree with each recommendation in the Report, the Commission unanimously agreed that the Report and Recommendations in its entirety provided a sound basis for legislation on the subject. On the question of to whom the statute should apply, the Commission recommended that it apply to all public employee groups in the State of Illinois. While cognizant of the fact that certain groups of employees such as teachers have been treated separately in some states, like California, the Commission felt that most labor-management problems requiring legislative action were the same for all groups and that any differences which might be inherent in certain occupational, groups could be worked out within the framework of one comprehensive statute.
ACCESSION #
5817887

 

Related Articles

  • Protection packet. Page, Emma // Commercial Motor;8/11/2005, Vol. 202 Issue 5140, p36 

    Reports on the changes in the Employment Relations Act 2004 enacted in Great Britain in April 2005. Requirements set by the legislation for labor unions when planning a labor strike; Influence of the legislation on the implementation of the Information and Consultation Directive; Provisions of...

  • Industrial Growth and Labor Relations in Puerto Rico. Vilella, Roberto Sanchez // Labor Law Journal;Oct59, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p701 

    The Eighth Annual Conference of the Association of State Mediation Agencies will afford us a splendid opportunity to profit from the wide experience in the field of conciliation. It will also offer an "opportunity to get acquainted with the work that has been done in this field in Puerto Rico...

  • What the French Strike Means.  // New Republic;6/17/36, Vol. 87 Issue 1124, p163 

    Focuses on the role of French socialist statesman Leon Blum in the settlement of most of the strikes in France. Terms of workers agreed upon by employers for the settlement; Range of increase in wages of workers, promised by employers; Recognition of the right of unionization and collective...

  • Should Congress Bring Organized Labor Under the Federal Anti-Trust Laws? CON. Teller, Ludwig // Congressional Digest;Apr50, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p123 

    The article presents views of the author presented before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, regarding the bill S. 2912. The bill is based on the mistaken notion that an antitrust law may be invoked to solve a labor problem. A close reading of the bill would seem to indicate that it has a...

  • THE SUBSTITUTE FOR TAFT-HARTLEY.  // New Republic;4/25/49, Vol. 120 Issue 17, p5 

    Focuses on the turmoil in the U.S. political scenario regarding the Taft-Hartley Act for labor unions. Substitute bill offered by some U.S. politicians against the Taft-Hartley Act; Criticism of the Taft-Hartley Act; Reason behind the outbreak of labor strikes in 1945-46; Criticism of the U.S....

  • How State Laws Regulate Labor Unions.  // Congressional Digest;Jan1946, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p32 

    Examines how state laws regulate labor unions. Authorization of strikes; Fines for each violation of labor organization; Prohibition of "Stand-in" employees.

  • How State Laws Regulate Labor Unions.  // Congressional Digest;Jan1946, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p32 

    Examines how state laws regulate labor unions. Authorization of strikes; Fines for each violation of labor organization; Prohibition of "Stand-in" employees.

  • Aussie Labor Crackdown.  // Multinational Monitor;Nov/Dec2005, Vol. 26 Issue 11/12, p4 

    Reports on the proposed labor law in Australia known as WorkChoices. Opposition of the Australian Council of Trade Unions to the legislation; Reaction of Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews to the allegations of the union; Reason for the necessity of the labor law changes according to...

  • Proper 'unionizing' is under threat. Attar, Kevin // New Hampshire Business Review;8/29/2008, Vol. 30 Issue 19, p17 

    The author reflects on the impact of the legislation called Employee Free Choice Art (EFCA) to workers in the U.S. He asserts that EFCA will remove the right of employees to a private ballot election when deciding to certify a union, as well as restrict the rights of an employer who is facing a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics