TITLE

Treat ghostwriting as misconduct

AUTHOR(S)
Bosch, Xavier
PUB. DATE
January 2011
SOURCE
Nature;1/27/2011, Vol. 469 Issue 7331, p472
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the absence of policies that prevent ghostwriting or guestwriting within Research-funding agencies, however the 2009 Danish law imposes that authorship fraud is considered as a research misconduct.
ACCESSION #
57590192

 

Related Articles

  • Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research-an empirical study of demarcation. Lynoe, Niels; Jacobsson, Lars // Journal of Medical Ethics;Dec99, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p501 

    Objectives--To study and describe how a group of senior researchers and a group of postgraduate students perceived the so-called "grey zone" between normal scientific practice and obvious misconduct. Design--A questionnaire concerning various practices including dishonesty and obvious...

  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Apologies for Scientific Misconduct: Do They Really Mean It? Souder, Lawrence // Science & Engineering Ethics;Mar2010, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p175 

    Since published acknowledgements of scientific misconduct are a species of image restoration, common strategies for responding publicly to accusations can be expected: from sincere apologies to ritualistic apologies. This study is a rhetorical examination of these strategies as they are...

  • Sitting in judgement. Check, Erika // Nature;9/26/2002, Vol. 419 Issue 6905, p332 

    Discusses the process for investigating scientific misconduct in the U.S. Use of teams of scientists to investigate other scientists; Details of the Office of Research Integrity which investigates the field of biomedicine; Reluctance of some scientists to work on the investigations since it...

  • Researcher accused of breaching research ethics faces GMC. Dyer, Owen // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);6/9/2007, Vol. 334 Issue 7605, p1185 

    This article examines the charges against Tonmoy Sharma, a former senior lecturer at the UK Institute of Psychiatry. Britain's General Medical Council (GMC) charges Sharma with breaching research ethics guidelines and lying to study sponsors. Sharma is also accused of recruiting patients by...

  • Misconduct in research: Editors respond. Smith, Richard // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);07/26/97, Vol. 315 Issue 7102, p201 

    Editorial. Reports on the rise in cases of research misconduct in Great Britain. Discovery of obstetrician Malcolm Pearce's forgery of series of papers; Editors' creation of Committee on Publication Ethics to confront the issue of research misconduct; Evidence that consultant physician John...

  • Editorial. Mukunda, N.; Nanjundiah, Vidyanand // Journal of Biosciences;Jun2008, Vol. 33 Issue 2, preceding p157 

    The article focuses on the issues concerning plagiarism in relation to writing a scientific paper. It states that the degree of plagiarism could be as mild as the copying of a single sentence from another author without acknowledgement to lifting of material from other sources. In connection,...

  • APPLYING COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN RESEARCH MISCONDUCT ANALYTICS. Hayen, Roger L.; Laverty, Joseph P. // Proceedings of the American Society of Business & Behavioral Sci;Feb2015, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p177 

    Research misconduct is a convoluted circumstance. There are many constituents stakeholders, beside the author. These include journal officers, publication editors, journal reviewers, a publication's submission guidelines, university administrators at various levels, university policies,...

  • The Editor's Bookshelf. Rossi, Anna Maria // European Science Editing;Feb2013, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p22 

    The article presents abstracts on topics related to science editing which include the pricing principles being used by scholarly open access publishers, the copyright and private reordering of scientific publishing, and the research misconduct and plagiarism associated with ghostwriting.

  • GMC suspends doctor for false research claims.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);12/3/2005, Vol. 331 Issue 7528, p1289 

    The article reports that the General Medical Council suspended a consultant who forged the signatures of two colleagues and falsely claimed authorship of research in which he had played no part. The consultant, Ranjit Sinharay, was suspended for three months. Sinharay's career in medicine is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics