Avi-Yonah, Reuven S.
August 2010
Wisconsin Law Review;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 4, p999
Academic Journal
In Citizens United vs. FEC, the Supreme Court struck down a Federal statute banning direct corporate expenditures on political campaigns. The decision has been widely criticized and praised as a matter of First Amendment law. But it is also interesting as another step in the evolution of our legal views of the corporation. This Article argues that by viewing Citizens United through the prism of theories about the corporate form, it is possible to see that the majority and the dissent departed from previous Supreme Court jurisprudence on the First Amendment rights of corporations. It is also possible to then predict what arguments can be expected next.


Related Articles

  • Law Review. Williams, Charles F. // Insights on Law & Society;Fall2010, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p24 

    A reprint of the article "Law Review," by Charles F. Williams, which appeared in the September 2010 issue of "Social Education" in the "Looking at the Law" feature, is presented. It focuses on the big campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. At issue in the case was...

  • In the Wake of Citizens United, Do Foreign Politics Still Stop at the Water's Edge? Solan, David // Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law;11/1/2010, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p281 

    In this article the author discusses the decisions of Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit organization, on potential laws that limit foreign influences in domestic campaigns in the U.S. He states that the organization produced the documentary film "Hillary: The Movie," which portrays...

  • The Political Score? Corporations, 1 - The People, 0. Gardam, Marybeth; Abbey, Nancy; Zepernick, Mary // Peace & Freedom;4/1/2010, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p13 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Supreme Court regarding the Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (FEC) case on free speech protection that concerns on the restrictions of federal campaign regulation and federal campaign expenditures. It mentions that the Supreme Court's...

  • Six Steps Away from Citizens United.  // FCNL Washington Newsletter;Jan/Feb2013, Issue 757, p12 

    The article offers steps in which the U.S. government can use to reverse damages caused by the decision on the case involving Citizens United. It states that a law that allows voters to identify political advertisement sponsors should be passed. It cites the need for the Securities and Exchange...

  • IN ALL FAIRNESS: USING POLITICAL BROADCAST ACCESS DOCTRINE TO TAILOR PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FUND MATCHING. Moshirnia, Andrew V.; Dozeman, Aaron T. // University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform;Spring2015, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p641 

    Recent United States Supreme Court, decisions have undermined the viability of campaign public financing systems, a vital tool for fighting political corruption. First, Citizens United v. FF.C allowed privately financed candidates and independent groups to spend unlimited amounts of money on...

  • Recent Developments in Maryland Campaign Finance Reform. Sandler, Joseph E.; La Forge, Amanda S. // Maryland Bar Journal;Mar/Apr2015, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p20 

    The article focuses on the brief history of recent campaign finance reform efforts in Maryland and the legislation and administrative policy to control the spending of money in elections under the election law of Maryland. It mentions the changes in political landscape due to the creation of...

  • Dark Money and Citizens United: What Obama and Romney Would and Wouldn't Do About It. Elliott, Justin // Pro Publica;10/23/2012, p1 

    The article discusses stand of U.S. President Barack Obama and presidential candidate Mitt Romney on election spending and the organization Citizens United. It states that though Obama talks about disclosure of donors he hasn't come up with campaign finance measures and he has discussed a...

  • Campaign Cash in Court's Cross Hairs. Kingsbury, Alex // U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/11/2009, Vol. 1 Issue 34, p8 

    The article delves into a case involving the nonprofit group Citizens United which produced the documentary film "Hillary: The Movie" through corporate funding. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission asserted that such movie must not be shown near the election for it will be a...

  • After Citizens United—What Changed?  // FCNL Washington Newsletter;Jan/Feb2013, Issue 757, p4 

    The article discusses the Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission which dropped the parts of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). It states that Citizens United surpassed the BCRA's provision which limits the amount of spending from money groups, allowing corporations and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics