TITLE

Review of Science Issues, Deployment Strategy, and Status for the ARM North Slope of Alaska-Adjacent Arctic Ocean Climate Research Site

AUTHOR(S)
Stamnes, K.; Ellingson, R.G.; Curry, J.A.; Walsh, J.E.; Zak, B.D.
PUB. DATE
January 1999
SOURCE
Journal of Climate;1/1/99, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Recent climate modeling results point to the Arctic as a region that is particularly sensitive to global climate change. The Arctic warming predicted by the models to result from the expected doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide is two to three times the predicted mean global warming, and considerably greater than the warming predicted for the Antarctic. The North Slope of Alaska-Adjacent Arctic Ocean (NSA-AAO) Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) site of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program is designed to collect data on temperature-ice-albedo and water vapor-cloud-radiation feedbacks, which are believed to be important to the predicted enhanced warming in the Arctic. The most important scientific issues of Arctic, as well as global, significance to be addressed at the NSA-AAO CART site are discussed, and a brief overview of the current approach toward, and status of, site development is provided. ARM radiometric and remote sensing instrumentation is already deployed and taking data in the perennial Arctic ice pack as part of the SHEBA (Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean) experiment. In parallel with ARM's participation in SHEBA, the NSA-AAO facility near Barrow was formally dedicated on 1 July 1997 and began routine data collection early in 1998. This schedule permits the U.S. Department of Energy's ARM Program, NASA's Arctic Cloud program, and the SHEBA program (funded primarily by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research) to be mutually supportive. In addition, location of the NSA-AAO Barrow facility on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration land immediately adjacent to its Climate Monitoring and Diagnostic Laboratory Barrow Observatory includes NOAA in this major interagency Arctic collaboration.
ACCESSION #
5579065

 

Related Articles

  • Global Warming Potentials: 2. Accuracy. Smith, Steven J.; Wigley, T.M.L. // Climatic Change;Mar2000, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p459 

    Part II. Exposes flaws in the mathematical structure of the Global Warming Potential (GWP) concept. Inaccuracy of the unit impulse response function; Errors in equivalent emissions changes; Fundamental problem of the structure.

  • Pacific island weather may hold clues to global climate change. Chamberlain, Gary // Design News;3/1/99, Vol. 55 Issue 5, p23 

    Reports on the installation of an atmospheric measurement station, called an Atmospheric Radiation and Cloud Station, in the tiny Pacific island of Nauru by a team of researchers from the United States Department of Energy. Aim to understand how sunlight and infrared radiation with clouds, and...

  • Developing countries dispute use of figures on climate change impacts. Masood, Ehsan // Nature;8/3/1995, Vol. 376 Issue 6539, p374 

    Reports on the dispute among developing countries attending a meeting to draft a document on the social costs of climate change. Impact of global warming to industrialized nations; Challenge by developing nations of criteria for measurement of damage caused by global warming; Failure by...

  • Indices of the factors that form climate changes of different scales. Karol', I.; Kiselev, A.; Frol'kis, V. // Izvestiya, Atmospheric & Oceanic Physics;Aug2011, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p415 

    Radiative forcing, the global warming potential, and the recently proposed global temperature potential are widely used not only in scientific studies but also in a number of economic and political evaluations of the effects of an increase in the contents of greenhouse gases and aerosols and...

  • ON THE CONFUSION OF PLANCK FEEDBACK PARAMETERS. Kimoto, Kyoji // Energy & Environment;2009, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p1057 

    The Planck feedback parameter λ0 is the most fundamental quantity in the theory of global warming, because the surface temperature change ΔTs,0 is calculated by- (radiative forcing due to CO2 doubling)/λ0 in the absence of feedbacks other than that of surface temperature change. The...

  • On the possibilities to use atmospheric reanalyses to evaluate the warming structure in the Arctic. Chung, C. E.; Cha, H.; Vihma, T.; Räisänen, P.; Decremer, D. // Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics;2013, Vol. 13 Issue 22, p11209 

    There has been growing interest in the vertical structure of the recent Arctic warming. We investigated temperatures at the surface, 925, 700, 500 and 300 hPa levels in the Arctic (north of 70° N) using observations and four reanalyses: ERA-Interim, CFSR, MERRA and NCEP II. For the period...

  • Radiation indices of climate-forming factors and their estimates under anthropogenic climate changes. Karol', I.; Kiselev, A.; Frol'kis, V. // Russian Meteorology & Hydrology;May2012, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p298 

    Predictions of expected climate changes are mainly based on the use of large climate models. In the results of these models, it is difficult sometimes to single out the effects and role of separate climate-forming factors. The estimates of such effects are needed for the activities on the...

  • Global Warming Potentials: 1. Climatic Implications of Emissions Reductions. Smith, Steven J.; Wigley, T. M. L. // Climatic Change;Mar2000, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p445 

    Part I. Examines the use of Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) to calculate equivalent carbon dioxide emissions reductions in the climate change context. Accuracy of GWPs; Effects of using GWPs over long time horizons; Long-term effect on climate of reducing methane emissions.

  • Refereed Papers: Uncertainty in the Global Average Surface Air Temperature Index: A Representative Lower Limit. Frank, Patrick // Energy & Environment;2010, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p969 

    Sensor measurement uncertainty has never been fully considered in prior appraisals of global average surface air temperature. The estimated average ±0.2 C station error has been incorrectly assessed as random, and the systematic error from uncontrolled variables has been invariably neglected....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics