TITLE

Low coverage but few inclusion errors in Burkina Faso: a community-based targeting approach to exempt the indigent from user fees

AUTHOR(S)
Ridde, Valéry; Haddad, Slim; Nikiema, Béatrice; Ouedraogo, Moctar; Kafando, Yamba; Bicaba, Abel
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p631
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: User fees were generalized in Burkina Faso in the 1990 s. At the time of their implementation, it was envisioned that measures would be instituted to exempt the poor from paying these fees. However, in practice, the identification of indigents is ineffective, and so they do not have access to care. Thus, a community-based process for selecting indigents for user fees exemption was tested in a district. In each of the 124 villages in the catchment areas of ten health centres, village committees proposed lists of indigents that were then validated by the health centres' management committees. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this community-based selection. Methods: An indigent-selection process is judged effective if it minimizes inclusion biases and exclusion biases. The study compares the levels of poverty and of vulnerability of indigents selected by the management committees (n = 184) with: 1) indigents selected in the villages but not retained by these committees (n = 48); ii) indigents selected by the health centre nurses (n = 82); and iii) a sample of the rural population (n = 5,900). Results: The households in which the three groups of indigents lived appeared to be more vulnerable and poorer than the reference rural households. Indigents selected by the management committees and the nurses were very comparable in terms of levels of vulnerability, but the former were more vulnerable socially. The majority of indigents proposed by the village committees who lived in extremely poor households were retained by the management committees. Only 0.36% of the population living below the poverty threshold and less than 1% of the extremely poor population were selected. Conclusions: The community-based process minimized inclusion biases, as the people selected were poorer and more vulnerable than the rest of the population. However, there were significant exclusion biases; the selection was very restrictive because the exemption had to be endogenously funded.
ACCESSION #
55563876

 

Related Articles

  • Determination of Package Cost of Surgeries and Other Services: An Approach for Introducing User Fees in Indian Healthcare System. Kumar, Santosh; Kanjilal, Barun // CURIE Journal;Jan2010, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p84 

    The ever growing resource crunch in the public health and population programmes in almost all the states of India and other parts of developing countries has made the policy makers realize that any programme including health can be sustained better if revenue is raised from the clients...

  • CCF Innovations collects a lot more in licensing fees. Stacklin, Jeff // Crain's Cleveland Business;1/20/2003, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p17 

    Reports on a rise in licensing fees collected by the Cleveland Clinics' technology transfer and commercialization office Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Innovations in 2002 as compared to fees collected by them in 2001. Possible reasons for the rise in licensing fees; Comparison between the...

  • No effect of user fee exemption on perceived quality of delivery care in Burkina Faso: a case-control study. Philibert, Aline; Ridde, Valéry; Bado, Aristide; Fournier, Pierre // BMC Health Services Research;2014, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: Although many developing countries have developed user fee exemption policies to move towards universal health coverage as a priority, very few studies have attempted to measure the quality of care. The present paper aims at assessing whether women's satisfaction with delivery care...

  • Cuts, cuts and more cuts. McCloughan, Ciaran // Lamp;Jun2014, Vol. 71 Issue 5, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented commenting on the move of the administration of Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to introduce a Medicare co-payment and the slashing of 80 billion dollars of health and education funding to the states.

  • A community-based targeting approach to exempt the worst-off from user fees in Burkina Faso. Ridde, V.; Yaogo, M.; Kafando, Y.; Sanfo, O.; Coulibaly, N.; Nitiema, P. A.; Bicaba, A. // Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health;Jan2010, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p2 

    Background: To contend with the risk of exclusion created by user fees, those implementing the Bamako Initiative (BI) were asked to organise exemption schemes for the indigent. But those exemption schemes were never put in place in Africa due to difficulties identifying the indigent. An action...

  • Metro DC Affiliate spearheads cooperative surveillance plan.  // Nation's Health;Jul99 Part 1 of 2, Vol. 29 Issue 6, p10 

    Offers a look at the plans of the Metropolitan Washington Public Health Association to create the Metropolitan Washington Public Health Assessment Center. Role of the center; Health departments that will benefit from this plan; Comments from Sam Seeman, liaison for the project; How the center...

  • Traditional medicine unit exciting. DEER, JESSICA // Eastern Door;8/3/2012, Vol. 21 Issue 30, p10 

    The article reflects on how the expansion of the Kateri Memorial Hospital Center in Kahnawake, Quebec that is expected to be completed by 2015 could be beneficial to the community for the next 20-25 years.

  • Urban Health Plan turns 25, gala reception at the Waldorf. Browne, J. Zamgba // New York Amsterdam News;10/05/2000, Vol. 91 Issue 40, p18 

    Features Urban Health Plan, a medical center in New York, New York. Celebration of the 25th anniversary center; Establishment of the nonprofit organization Urban Health Plan Inc.; Number of patients accommodated by the center annually.

  • Professions rally against changes to Medicare.  // Australian Nursing & Midwifery Journal;Feb2014, Vol. 21 Issue 7, p5 

    The article reports on 2014 rallies in Perth, Melbourne and Sydney, Australia featuring nurses and midwives who voiced their opposition to changes in the country's Medicare system and a proposed government fee under which Australians would pay six dollars for doctor's visits. The views that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics