November 2010
Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);11/15/2010, Vol. 27 Issue 46, pP16
The article reveals that business leaders in Nevada were disappointed with the way voters opposed the changes proposed in the system of electing judges in a state ballot measure during the November 2010 midterm elections in the U.S. It says that the merit selection of judges would have served the best interest of the state because of the scrutiny judges would receive between terms. It said that the measure would have required 55% of the votes in a retention election of judges and justices and would have attracted more out-of-state companies to Nevada.


Related Articles

  • A Run for the Bench. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Oct98, Vol. 84 Issue 10, p68 

    Presents information on judicial elections in the United States, while indicating that judges in Texas must run for election in partisan races. Amount of money judges in urban areas spend campaigning; Goals of judicial election reforms in the US; Comparison of judicial elections to political...

  • Judicial Election Upset. Hathorn, Clay // ABA Journal;Dec90, Vol. 76 Issue 12, p26 

    Reports on the victory of solo practitioner Charles W. Johnson in the supreme court elections in Washington. Reasons for the public and law practitioners' surprise over Johnson's victory; Factors that contributed to the lawyer's election victory. INSET: Hawking Judges.

  • Information needed to help voters judge. McIntyre, Kathryn J. // Business Insurance;11/09/98, Vol. 32 Issue 45, p81 

    Opinion. Comments on the need for more information to be given to voters on the retention of judges. Victory of seven judges for whom the author voted against; Low vote approval for judges; Lack of reports on judges' performance to help voters decide.

  • My Picks for the Most Powerful. Mahoney, Sean // Business NH Magazine;Jan2008, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p7 

    The author reflects on the contribution of the most powerful political and business leaders in New Hampshire (NH). He states that he considers Dartmouth College President Jim Wright and the NH voters as the powerful leaders in the country which should have been included in the Most Powerful list...

  • The voters' will: Results of hot judicial races. Frank, Cheryl // ABA Journal;Jan1985, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p17 

    Presents results of elections for judicial positions in the United States as of January 1985. Decision of Illinois voters to keep all judges up for retention; Judges who were defeated in the Ohio elections; Victory of Dorothy Comstock Riley in the elections for a seat at the Michigan Supreme Court.

  • Texas Judicial Elections Upheld. DeBenedictis, Don J. // ABA Journal;Dec90, Vol. 76 Issue 12, p14 

    Reports that the Fifth United States Circuit Court has ruled that Section Two of the Voting Rights Act, which states that minorities must have an equal opportunity to elect representative of their choice, is not applicable to judicial elections. Conflicts of the court's decision with previous...

  • Taking a Second Look at Giving. Podgers, James // ABA Journal;Apr99, Vol. 85 Issue 4, p87 

    Reports on the judicial election measures outlined in the draft of American Bar Association (ABA) Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Campaign Finance that would be incorporated into the ABA Model of Code Judicial Conduct and the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Reason for appointing the...

  • Take judge nominations out of parties' hands.  // Crain's Detroit Business;04/03/2000, Vol. 16 Issue 14, p8 

    Opinion. Comments on the judicial election in the Michigan Supreme Court. Search for a Democratic nomination to the bench by Macom County Prosecutor Carl Marlinga; Implications of the campaign funds on the judicial election; Use of a partisan process in the judicial election; Efficacy of voter...

  • THE HIGH COST OF JUDGING. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Sep91, Vol. 77 Issue 9, p44 

    Focuses on the high cost and long hours involved in electing judges in the United States. Impact on the court's productivity; Assault on the integrity of the judiciary caused by the practice of subjecting judges to periodic political campaigns; Process of selecting judges.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics