TITLE

Citizens United: Latest Campaign Finance Decision Creates More Gray Areas

AUTHOR(S)
Getman, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
April 2010
SOURCE
Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Spring2010, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p13
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article looks at the consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which permitted corporations to make unlimited advocacy expenditures in election campaigns. It cites the arguments presented by the defendant on issues like electioneering communication and mentions the merits of other similar cases which the court used as a basis to take side with Citizens United. It also discusses the implications of the court's decision for political advertising and for the inviolability of U.S. democracy.
ACCESSION #
54322017

 

Related Articles

  • CITIZENS UNITED AGAINST CITIZENS UNITED: A MOVEMENT IS BUILDING TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION. Ott, Riki // Earth Island Journal;Autumn2012, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p40 

    The article focuses on the decision given by the U.S. Supreme Court in a court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. The court ruled that corporations as persons have a First Amendment right to use unlimited amounts of money, as speech, on advertisement campaigns as long as those...

  • Six Steps Away from Citizens United.  // FCNL Washington Newsletter;Jan/Feb2013, Issue 757, p12 

    The article offers steps in which the U.S. government can use to reverse damages caused by the decision on the case involving Citizens United. It states that a law that allows voters to identify political advertisement sponsors should be passed. It cites the need for the Securities and Exchange...

  • Movers & Shakers.  // Campaigns & Elections (2010);Jul2010, Vol. 31 Issue 293, p14 

    An interview with Carl Forti, political director of American Crossroads, is presented. Forti says that the goal of American Crossroads is to spend money where they think it can be most effective. He emphasizes an issue about a special election in Mississippi when Freedom's Watch was running...

  • OPENING THE FLOODGATES?: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE POLITICAL ACTIVITY AFTER CITIZENS UNITED. Persinger, John // Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy;2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p327 

    The article focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court case judgment in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) on corporate governance and corporate political activity. Topics include the U.S. Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, the increase in political campaign donations...

  • THE SYSTEM ISN'T BROKEN, IT'S FIXED: ENDING BIG MONEY AND CORPORATIONS IN OUR ELECTIONS. Coleridge, Greg // University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p541 

    In this article the author discusses political influence of large corporations especially in elections campaigns and reflects on the corrupt political process in the U.S. It highlights the need for constitutional amendment regarding constitutional rights and regulation of political spending and...

  • MONEY CHANGES Everything. EPPS, GARRETT // American Prospect;May2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p32 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010. It infers that the Court's ruling on corporate personhood has resulted in the use of large amounts of untraceable money for political advertisements. Critics...

  • We, the People. Ahmad, Meher; DiNovella, Elizabeth // Progressive;Apr2012, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p8 

    In this article, the author discusses the negative advertisement campaigns in the U.S. The author mentions that in the U.S. 2012 Presidential election, people will see the largest amount of money ever spent on negative advertisements, with total spending estimated more than three billion...

  • Election Spending: Reformers On Flood Watch. Jerome, Sara // National Journal;11/7/2009, p2 

    The article focuses on several countermeasures that might be pursued by campaign finance reform advocates in the U.S. if the Supreme Court issues the broadest potential decision in the case Citizens United versus Election Commission. It notes that boosting the influence of small donors is a way...

  • The Citizens United Catastrophe. DIONNE JR., E. J. // Moderate Voice;2/6/2012, p13 

    The article offers the author's perspective on the implication of the U.S. Supreme Court decision involving Citizens United against the Federal Election Commission (FEC). He states that such decision suits to the wealthiest and most powerful people in the nation, particularly if they desire to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics