TITLE

Time to revisit Australia's climate change policy

AUTHOR(S)
Carter, Bob
PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
Energy & Environment;2006, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p103
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers the author's insights on government policy on climate change in Australia, suggesting that the government must avoid listening to scientists and to the United Nations. The author emphasizes that climatic changes will not be addressed through carbon dioxide emission reduction, rather in implementing appropriate disaster response strategies. The author adds that some Australians expressed their opposition on economic analysis of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
ACCESSION #
52955900

 

Related Articles

  • CARBON: Budget for Humanity. Newman, Alex // New American (08856540);11/04/2013, Vol. 29 Issue 21, p30 

    The article reports the decision of the United Nations (UN) and climate alarmists in restricting too much use for carbon dioxide emissions in countries such as the Africa, Latin America and large swaths of Asia. It mentions that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calls for...

  • Climate change: there's still time to act.  // Financial Management;Feb2015, p21 

    The article presents the report of the United Nation's (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the damages brought by climate changes worldwide and the need to act immediately to reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide.

  • On the road to danger.  // New Scientist;9/28/2013, Vol. 219 Issue 2936, p6 

    The article looks at a 2013 report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions have reached the halfway point to the threshold for dangerous levels of global warming, calling for geoengineering to mitigate atmospheric carbon.

  • Reasonable Suspicion: Gloomy Future of the Kyoto Protocol. Gieop Na, Kelly // Journal of East Asia & International Law;2013, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p553 

    About 25 years ago, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change claimed that the greenhouse gases, in particular Carbon Dioxide, are mainly responsible for global warming and its adverse effects. The claim rapidly became an absolute and incontrovertible truth regardless of countless scientific...

  • A good climate for investment. Gelbspan, Ross // Atlantic;Jun1998, Vol. 281 Issue 6, p22 

    The article focuses on the impact of carbon dioxide on the environment, while highlighting the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The carbon pumped into the atmosphere by human industry is said to be leading to catastrophic changes in the atmosphere. The need to...

  • IPCC: social scientists are ready. Stern, Paul C.; Dietz, Thomas // Nature;5/14/2015, Vol. 521 Issue 7551, p161 

    A letter to the editor is presented in which the authors discuss the role of social scientists within the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

  • Aircraft Emissions Expected to Grow, but Technological and Operational Improvements and Government Policies Can Help Control Emissions.  // GAO Reports;6/8/2009, preceding p1 

    The article reports on the control of aircraft emission by way of technological and operational improvements and government policies in the U.S. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reveals that aviation is accountable for about 2% of human-generated global carbon dioxide emissions....

  • Overview of mitigation scenarios for global climate stabilization based on new IPCC emission scenarios (SRES). Morita, Tsuneyuki; Nakićenović, Nebo&#s0161;ja; Robinson, John // Environmental Economics & Policy Studies;2000, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p65 

    This paper provides an overview of new emission mitigation scenarios that lead to stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, presented in this Special Issue. All of these scenarios use as their baselines the new IPCC scenarios published in the IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios...

  • The benefits and costs of waiting: early action versus delayed response in post-SRES stabilization scenarios. Bollen, Johannes; Manders, Ton; Timmer, Hans // Environmental Economics & Policy Studies;2000, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p143 

    This paper analyzes the economic impact of mitigation policies that lead to stabilization of CO2 concentrations at levels of 550 and 450 ppmv, respectively. We successively use each of the four new IPCC scenarios as a baseline. We analyze the impact of two different mitigation paths to the same...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics