Kahn, Jeffrey
March 2010
Michigan Law Review;Mar2010, Vol. 108 Issue 5, p673
Academic Journal
Some federal courts have devised a new test of prudential standing that they use to dismiss suits filed by foreign plaintiffs alleging unlawful conduct by American officials abroad, even when these cases involve matters that may have nothing to do with foreign affairs, national security, or terrorism. Rather than decide the case on its merits or dismiss it on any number of legitimate grounds, the complaint is dismissed because the plaintiff lacks a "prior substantial connection" to the United States. I identify and critique this strange but proliferating test of standing. First, it is inconsistent with any theoretical view of the Constitution's extraterritorial application, including the functional one recently advanced in Boumediene v. Bush, the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark habeas corpus decision. Second, it advances none of the policy interests that prudential standing was created to promote. The test has been wrenched from its origins as an approach to decide the merits of a constitutional question; it is now used to decide jurisdiction. This impedes the development of an important area of case law while abdicating the judicial role in defining the limits of state power. The Article begins with an in-depth case study (based on interviews and primary sources) of a takings claim that would have been unexceptional but for its foreign location and rather shocking allegations against the United States. I repeatedly reference this case while examining the theoretical and practical inconsistencies of dismissing "Zoya's case" not because the courts found fault with her claim, but because she lacked a prior substantial connection to the United States.


Related Articles

  • Intel insider. Reed, Christopher // Bulletin with Newsweek;5/13/2003, Vol. 121 Issue 6372, p14 

    The article focuses on the lawsuit between the homeland security enforcers at the U.S. Department of Justice and civil rights groups supported by the Muslim community in Oregon. The extra defendant is Intel software engineer Maher Hawash, 39, a U.S. citizen for 15 years who was arrested at...

  • Two More Circuits Rule on Class Arbitration Waivers.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Feb-Apr2011, Vol. 66 Issue 1, p5 

    The article reports that two U.S. federal appeals courts have considered on issues related to class arbitration waivers including Viches versus The Travelers Cos. and In Re American Express Merchant Litigation.

  • ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT.  // International Law Update;Apr2009, Vol. 15, p42 

    The article presents several cases related to Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) in the U.S. It presents the case of Mohamed, an Ethiopian citizen and a suspect of terrorism against Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., a subsidiary of the Boeing Co. It further states that the defendant have played a crucial role...

  • Unalachtigo Band Must Try Land Case in Federal Court.  // Native American Law Digest;Mar2005, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p10 

    This article reports that the New Jersey Appeals Court has held that the Unalachtigo Band of the Nanticoke-Lenni Lenape Nation must take its land claim to federal court. The band sued the state in October 2001 seeking control of laud that was formerly the Brotherton Reservation. The tribe...

  • Blacks more willing to concede privacy. Curry, George E. // Charlotte Post;6/27/2013, Vol. 38 Issue 42, p1B 

    The article presents the results of a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center and the "Washington Post" on whether Americans are in favor of invading their privacy rights by the U.S. National Security Agency in an effort to prevent terrorism.

  • Islamophobia: Not A National Security Strategy Bloomberg News.  // News India Times;12/2/2016, Vol. 47 Issue 49, p2 

    The article discusses the claim that Islamophobia is not a national security strategy of the U.S. government in the midst of President-elect Donald Trump's promise to fight against radical Islamic terrorism.

  • Patriot Act Challenge Allowed to Proceed.  // American Libraries;Nov2006, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p10 

    The article reports on the refusal of U.S. District Judge Denise Hood to the U.S. government's request to dismiss a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of the USA Patriot Act. Specifically, the ACLU seeks to block Section 215 of the Patriot Act,...

  • Being There Edwin Kagin. Donaldson, Brent // Cincinnati Magazine;Nov2009, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p24 

    The article presents the views of Edwin Kagin, national legal director for American Atheists, who represented the plaintiffs in a court case, in which it was ruled that the pharse dependence on Almighty God as being vital to the security of the Commonwealth, be stricken from Kentucky's homeland...

  • Silent Suits. Sanchez, Julian // Reason;Aug/Sep2004, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p8 

    Reports on a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yok, challenging the Federal Bureau of Investigation's authority to issue national security letters and extrajudicial demands for information expanded by the Patriot Act. ...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics