TITLE

Court Opens Campaign Funding Floodgates

AUTHOR(S)
Kingsbury, Alex
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
U.S. News Digital Weekly;1/22/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court changed its decision by 5 votes to 4 on the restrictions on the financial support of corporations, unions, and other groups in campaign endorsements of U.S. political candidates. The legislation, known as the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, is known for its mandatory ban on companies and unions from investing on political advertisements. The issue of whether the McCain-Feingold law be applied has been debated since the release of the documentary "Hillary the Movie" in 2008.
ACCESSION #
52759352

 

Related Articles

  • The Money Game: Changing the Rules.  // Time;2/9/1976, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p10 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on campaign finance of the 1976 presidential candidates based on the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974. It says that the law's rule restricting the campaign contributions to 1000 dollars was left intact, though the court...

  • PUBLIC FUNDING AFTER DAVIS v. FEC: Is CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM THE STATES STILL LEGALLY VIABLE? Chen Li // George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal;Spring2010, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p279 

    The article looks at the legality of political campaign finance in the U.S. after the Davis v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) case. It examines the legal challenges brought against the state laws which help political candidates finance campaigns and curtail campaign spending, the logic that...

  • Campaign Finance And Corporations. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;7/11/2009, p14 

    The author argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should repeal the Wellstone amendment restricting independent corporate spending to influence elections as violative of the First Amendment rights that guarantee citizens the freedom to criticize officeholders and candidates. He surmised that the...

  • MONEY TALKS. Toobin, Jeffrey // New Yorker;4/11/2011, Vol. 87 Issue 8, p17 

    The author comments on a case before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the legalities of an Arizona law called the Citizens Clean Elections Act, which allows less wealthy political candidates to draw on state money to finance their campaigns. The author feels that the law will be found...

  • Biz, nonprofits can be bigger players in candidate ads. Halcom, Chad // Crain's Detroit Business;1/25/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p3 

    The article reports on a new ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court easing restrictions on corporate spending in election campaigns. Under the ruling, corporations and nonprofit organizations could make corporate independent expenditures and help promote political candidates, that was previously...

  • Get Over It: Campaign Finance Limits Don't Work. Oliphant, James // National Journal;10/19/2013, p8 

    The author ponders on the plan of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down some parts of the campaign finance law which deals with limiting direct contributions to candidates. Information on the Supreme Court case, McCutcheon v. FEC, is presented. He believes that limits placed on expenditures that...

  • SUPREME COURT TO OK AL QAEDA DONATION FOR PALIN? Palast, Greg // Progressive Populist;2/1/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p13 

    The article reports on the would-be decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on corporate and institutional donations to political candidates. It mentions that the issue is whether corporations as an unnatural person can make contributions to political campaigns. It notes that the would-be ruling of...

  • Campaign Finance Law Under Siege. Jerome, Sara // National Journal;11/21/2009, p3 

    The article focuses on the millionaire's amendment, a campaign finance law that was aimed at making it harder for wealthy, self-financed political candidates to secure a seat in office, that was invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008. Based on data from the Center for Responsive Politics,...

  • Viewpoint: Future of U.S. Politics Hangs on Court Campaign Finance Decision. Cohen, Adam // Time.com;10/10/2013, p1 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and why he feels the future of U.S. politics rests on the Court's decision regarding campaign finance. Topics include U.S. laws governing donor limits to political...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics