TITLE

A Bigger Boom Box

AUTHOR(S)
Rauber, Paul
PUB. DATE
May 2010
SOURCE
Sierra;May/Jun2010, Vol. 95 Issue 3, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which allows corporations to contribute an unlimited amount of money to candidates in federal elections. Topics include an overview of the environmental concerns as a result of the Supreme Court's decision, such as the corporate influence of the petroleum industry on election results.
ACCESSION #
50137334

 

Related Articles

  • Campaign Finance After Citizens United: What the Future May Hold. Francia, Peter L. // Campaigns & Elections (2010);May2011, Vol. 32 Issue 303, p16 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United versus the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on January 21, 2010. It states that the ruling reversed the prohibition on spending general treasury funds by corporations and labor unions on election-related...

  • Campaign finance: The perils of favorable SCOTUS rulings for corporations. Levick, Richard // InsideCounsel;Jun2014, Vol. 25 Issue 270, p13 

    The article talks about two U.S. court cases that stress the need for a commitment to manage the risks that accompany political giving. These cases include McCutcheon v. FEC and Citizens United v. FEC. Topics discussed include a federal election law that sets aggregate limits on campaign...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT--SECTION 441b's PROHIBITION AGAINST THE USE OF CORPORATE TREASURY FUNDS FOR EXPRESS ADVOCACY VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Eiland, Elizabeth A. // Cumberland Law Review;2010, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p179 

    The article discusses court cases wherein plaintiffs filed a suit in the U.S. Supreme Court claiming the unconstitutionality of U.S. Code Section 441b's ban on corporate-funded electioneering communications. It discusses cases that violates the First Amendment free speech guarantees including...

  • CLINTON, CAMPAIGNS, AND CORPORATE EXPENDITURES: THE SUPREME COURT'S RECENT DECISION IN CITIZEN'S UNITED AND ITS IMPACT ON CORPORATE POLITICAL INFLUENCE. VOGEL, GLEN M. // St. John's Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 86 Issue 1, p183 

    The article discusses the Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the U.S. It outlines the provisions and critical components of the campaign finance law, McCain-Feingold Act, and provides an overview of the background of the case and its...

  • Citizens United. Gizzi, John // Human Events;2/1/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 5, p22 

    The author expresses his views on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. He emphasizes that the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions are now free to spend their money to support candidates for federal...

  • Courts and Congress Respond to Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Sharkey, Brian P. // Young Lawyer;May2010, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p1 

    The article focuses on the controversies surrounding the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It discusses the court's decision to strike down the ban on corporate political expenditure. It further states that court's ruling overturned...

  • Is the Citizens United Decision Hurting Democracy? Waldman, Michael // U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/24/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p11 

    The author comments on whether the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission affects U.S. democracy. In the case, the Court ruled that companies can spend money on political campaigns. The author believes that the ruling affects democracy in...

  • More Candidates Advocate Pledge to Reduce Outside Spending in Elections. Friedlander, Robb // Public Citizen News;Sep/Oct2014, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p7 

    The article reports on the People's Pledge, a formal campaign finance agreement between all U.S candidates and their campaigns that seeks the reductions in outside spending in the U.S elections. Topics discussed include the ruling of the U.S Supreme Court in the court case Citizens United v....

  • Four Questions for 2010. D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p15 

    The article discusses several issues related to the ruling on the case of Citizens United in the U.S. It states that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) will discuss the framework on expenditures and new coordination rules at a public hearing on March 2 and 3, 2010. It adds that small donor...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics