Obama's 2011 budget proposes one more year of growth for science and technology

Kramer, David
April 2010
Physics Today;Apr2010, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p27
Academic Journal
The article reports on the 2011 budget proposal of U.S. President Barack Obama for science and technology (S&T). It notes the guaranteed support for S&T and the allocation of 66 billion dollars for civilian research and 61.6 billion dollars for defense and non-defense research. Agencies with budgets being doubled are the National Science Foundation, the Office of Science of the Department of Energy (DOE) and the core research programs of the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST).


Related Articles

  • Grid receives funding.  // R&D Magazine;Oct2006, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p21 

    The article reports on the funding awarded by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science to the Open Science Grid (OSG) Consortium. The award will operate and expand the OSG, a computing environment used by scientists to harness computing resources and...

  • Budgeting for the long run.  // Nature Materials;Jun2011, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p407 

    The author reflects on the research and development (R&D) budget of the U.S. federal government in 2011. The author notes that the Plan for Science and Innovation of President Barack Obama proposed to double the budgets of the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institute of...

  • Progress on 2009 budget stalled.  // Issues in Science & Technology;Fall2008, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p21 

    The article reports on the unfinished appropriation bills for the fiscal year 2009 in the U.S. The Congress has not yet completed analyzing the budget bills for various government departments and three physical sciences agencies that endorsed large increases including the National Science...

  • Republican spending plan casts shadow on science. Maxmen, Amy // Nature;8/23/2012, Vol. 488 Issue 7412, p441 

    The article focuses on the plan of Paul Ryan, running mate of U.S. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, to cut expenditures on non-defence-related research and development in the U.S. It states that the plans of Ryan from federal spending contrast the budget requests and plans of U.S. President...

  • Plans bode well for high-tech. Soule, Alexander // Westchester County Business Journal;5/4/2009, Vol. 48 Issue 18, p9 

    The article reports on the impact of the pledge made by U.S. President Barack Obama to double the budget of the National Science Foundation and other federal laboratories doing scientific research on the high-technology sector in New York. The pledge of the President brings major implications in...

  • WASHINGTON NEWS.  // JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TM;Sep2007, Vol. 59 Issue 9, p14 

    The article reports that U.S. President George W. Bush has signed the America COMPETES Act into law on August 9, 2007. The bill includes the basic elements of the President's American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) and the Democratic Congressional Leadership's National Innovation Initiative....

  • FY 2009 budget set; 2010 coming into focus.  // American Ceramic Society Bulletin;Apr2009, Vol. 88 Issue 4, p18 

    The article offers information on the passing of the omnibus budget appropriations for fiscal year (FY) 2009. It notes that the bill has provided significant increases for science and technology programs in the U.S. including the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards...

  • Federal budget 2013 -- What the proposed budget is offering for science R&D.  // American Ceramic Society Bulletin;Apr2012, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p3 

    The article discusses the civilian science and technology portion of the fiscal year 2013 (FY 13) U.S. federal budget of the administration of President Barack Obama. It details that the FY 13 budget requested 140.8 billion U.S. dollars for federally supported research and development (R&D). The...

  • Double trouble? To throw cash at science is a mistake. Sarewitz, Daniel // Nature;11/11/2010, Vol. 468 Issue 7321, p135 

    In this article the author examines on whether doubling the funds of the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) is a mistake. He is critical to the effect of increasing the NSF budget to politics and to the politicians, as well as its effect on policy-making. It also examines the political...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics