TITLE

Medical Practices Committee

AUTHOR(S)
Whowell, W.B.
PUB. DATE
November 1981
SOURCE
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);11/28/1981, Vol. 283 Issue 6304, p1485
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the medical practices committee in Great Britain. Implementation of principles of the National Health Service; Need for adequate number of family doctors throughout the country; Control of the distribution of general practitioners; Appeals committee for refusal of employment of assistants.
ACCESSION #
4919881

 

Related Articles

  • Safeguard for GMS practices in flu pandemic.  // Pulse;5/7/2008, Vol. 68 Issue 16, p2 

    The article reports on the initiative of the British National Health Service (NHS) and General Practitioners Committee (GPC) to protect group medical services (GMS) practice from influenza pandemic. NHS and GPC assure that general practitioners (GPs) responding to pandemic emergency will not...

  • Revalidation leads in post across UK. Sell, Susie // GP: General Practitioner;4/15/2011, p6 

    The article reports that most primary care trust (PCT) areas in England have appointed a responsible officer (RO) for revalidation, with full coverage in Wales and Scotland. The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) revalidation lead Professor Mike Pringle stated that vast majority' of...

  • CCG boundaries finalised.  // Pulse;2/8/2012, Vol. 72 Issue 5, p4 

    The article reports that Great Britain National Health Service (NHS) chief executive Sir David Nicholson claims that an estimated 95% of clinical commissioning groups (CCG) already finalised their boundaries and the general practitioner (GP) practices they select to be included.

  • GPC and NHS employers carve up 0.8% pay award.  // Pulse;6/9/2010, Vol. 70 Issue 20, p3 

    The article discusses the decision of the General Practitioners Committee (GPC) and National Health Service (NHS) employers to carve up 8% pay award to enhance services and locum payments in Great Britain.

  • GPC leaders begin to get ballot jitters. Hairon, Nerys // Pulse;5/13/2002, Vol. 62 Issue 19, p1 

    Deals with the concerns of leaders from the General Practitioners Committee over their contract framework in the June 2002 elections. Worries about the actions the General Practitioners Association may take; Implications of general practitioners abstaining from voting; Reasons for voting...

  • Conspiracy or cock up?  // Pulse;12/9/2002, Vol. 62 Issue 47, p16 

    Focuses on the negotiations between the General Practitioners Committee and the National Health Service Confederation on the GMS contract in Great Britain. Promotion of quality-based patient centered services; Factors affecting the improvement of primary care; Problems associated with the...

  • Rule change means GPs must review diabetes patients. Moberly, Tom // GP: General Practitioner;3/4/2011, p1 

    The article offers information on the scheme which reviews the treatment of diabetic people by various general practitioners. It states that scheme was formed by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) and National Health Services (NHS) Diabetes. In this audit of one million patient is...

  • RCGP to report on profession's future.  // GP: General Practitioner;3/4/2011, p3 

    The article offers information the Commission on Generalism formed by the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) which focuses on the future role of generalism In National Health Services (NHS). It present the views of Clare Gerada, chairman of RCGP, who states that NHS reforms helps in...

  • LMCs want compensation over patient list cuts. Rimmer, Abi // GP: General Practitioner;6/17/2011, p6 

    The article reports on the demand of Local Medical Committees (LMCs) in Great Britain for compensating general practitioners (GPs) in the country when primary care trusts (PCTs) cuts patients from the GPs' list. It is reported that, at the 2011 LMCs conference in London, England in June 2011,...

  • Rushing the NHS 111 rollout is reckless. Buckman, Laurence // Pulse;3/28/2012, Vol. 72 Issue 11, p16 

    The article focuses on the hearing of the General Practitioners Committee (GPC) from the concerns of the General Practitioners (GP) regarding the new National Health Service (NHS) 111 urgent care number.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics