TITLE

The media frets while libel cases are pondered

PUB. DATE
February 1984
SOURCE
ABA Journal;Feb84, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p116
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Provides an overview of news media cases argued before the Supreme Court on November 8, 1983, that could affect the way libel actions are brought. Bose Corp.'s contentions of product disparagement against 'Consumer Reports'; Kathy Keeton's libel and invasion of privacy claims against 'Hustler'; Actress Shirley Jones' lawsuit against the 'National Enquirer.'
ACCESSION #
4807083

 

Related Articles

  • NEW PROPOSAL TO DEAL WITH LIBEL. Goldberg, Stephanie Benson // ABA Journal;Jan1989, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p34 

    Focuses on the proposed changes in handling libel lawsuits in the United States from the Libel Reform Project of the Northwestern University. Prevention for plaintiffs for filing suit without demanding retraction or the right to reply; Suggestion for electing a no-fault trial for a declaratory...

  • Libel trials reach record number.  // Editor & Publisher;06/27/98, Vol. 131 Issue 26, p49 

    Reports that the number of libel trials in the United States has reached 22 and the average jury award was $588,700 in 1997, according to the Libel Defense Resource Center.

  • DEFAMATION: THE NEW LEGAL CHALLENGE TO EMPLOYERS. Torsone, Johnna G. // Management Review;May87, Vol. 76 Issue 5, p12 

    Focuses on the challenges faced by employers in the United States involved in defamation lawsuits. Categories that will make employers liable for defamation suits; Details of the constitutional basis of defamation lawsuits; Case examples illustrating employer experiences.

  • Who Does the First Amendment Protect?: Why the Plaintiff Should Bear the Burden of Proof in Any Defamation Action. Hagans, William G. // Review of Litigation;Summer2007, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p613 

    The article presents the author's views on legal issues related to defamation suits in the U.S. According to the author, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has tended to extend protection to defendant by placing the burden of proof on plaintiff, with regard to the truthfulness of a...

  • NEGLIGENT INJURY TO REPUTATION: DEFAMATION PRIORITY AND THE ECONOMIC LOSS RULE. Wheeler, Travis M. // Arizona Law Review;Winter2006, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p1103 

    The article presents a study that considers cases in which plaintiffs seek reputational damages without pleading defamation in the U.S. It was stated that when a plaintiff is seeking damages for reputational injury without pleading dafamation, a court should acknowledge whether the claim...

  • Solid journalism still best protection from libel suits when covering terrorism. Gauthier, Ashley // IRE Journal;Jan/Feb2005, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p11 

    Features several libel court cases involving reporting on terrorism. Jewell v. NYP Holdings, which concerns a suspect involved in the 1996 Olympics bombing; Global Relief Foundation Inc. v. The New York Times Co., which involves the suspicions of the U.S. government against the activities of...

  • Defamation in the Workplace. Yulish, David; Heshizer, Brian // Labor Law Journal;Jun89, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p355 

    The article presents a discussion related lawsuits on defamation in the workplace in the U.S. Defamation is a tort action that has been widely recognized, but it has only been in recent years that the concept has been increasingly utilized in the employment context. In defending against a...

  • Meet John Doe. Smith, Brendan L. // ABA Journal;Jan2010, Vol. 96 Issue 1, p14 

    The article discusses the Internet defamation litigations in the U.S. It notes that Internet users are using the Web's anonymity to criticize celebrities, politicians, and reveal corporate misdeeds. It adds that subjects of defamation resort to defamation suits but are having problems as to...

  • Notes and Recent Decisions: TORTS: DEFAMATION: INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY FOR GROUP LIBEL: OPINION EVIDENCE IN LIBEL CASES. Talt, Alan R. // California Law Review;Spring53, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p144 

    Focuses on the rule prohibiting an individual plaintiff from maintaining an action for group defamation in the U.S. Ability of an individual to sustain an action; Exceptions to the rule.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics