TITLE

Justices Turn Down Decalogue Appeal

PUB. DATE
July 2001
SOURCE
Christianity Today;7/9/2001, Vol. 45 Issue 9, p15
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case in which an Indiana town's display of the Ten Commandments was found to be unconstitutional. Discussion on the unconstitutionality issue of the display; Reasons for the decision of the Court.
ACCESSION #
4726577

 

Related Articles

  • The Ten Commandments. Savage, David C. // Education Digest;Jan1981, Vol. 46 Issue 5, p65 

    The article states that the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Kentucky law that specified that each classroom would have posted a 16-by-20-inch copy of the Ten Commandments. The U.S. Supreme Court has seemed in recent years to be less concerned about the mixing of church and state. But a state...

  • Posting Decalogue OK--sometimes.  // Christian Century;7/12/2005, Vol. 122 Issue 14, p13 

    Reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2005 that the posting of the Ten Commandments inside courthouses in Kentucky is unconstitutional. Decision of the court on the display of the Decalogue on government properties; Background on a poll conducted by the Pew Forum in August...

  • TRAVELING CIRCUS. Boston, Rob // Church & State;Nov2003, Vol. 56 Issue 10, p11 

    Reports that Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore filed one last appeal before the Supreme Court to take Ten Commandments Case. Criticism of the Supreme Court for its decisions upholding church-state separation; Moore's insistence that he had the authority to display a Ten Commandments...

  • High court takes pass on Decalogue case.  // Christian Century;3/13/2002, Vol. 119 Issue 6, p12 

    Reports on the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to enter a debate on whether the Ten Commandments should be displayed on government grounds. Relation of the commandments to government administration; Views of the American Civil Liberties Union on the debate.

  • How High a Wall? Garnett, Richard W. // Commonweal;5/20/2005, Vol. 132 Issue 10, p11 

    Comments on the Ten Commandments cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court Chamber on March 2, 2005. Opinion on the First Amendment clause which states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion; Establishment of permissible recognition and accommodation of religion...

  • NOTABLE QUOTE.  // American City & County;Aug2005, Vol. 120 Issue 9, p24 

    Presents the views of Vernon Robinson, councilman of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the display of Ten Commandments at courthouses in the U.S.

  • The Supreme Court Rules: 2005. Uhlmann, Michael M. // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct2005, Issue 156, p35 

    Comments on the United States Supreme Court's rulings on Ten Commandments cases. Constitutionality of religious displays; Capability of the Supreme Court to influence the American political culture; Court's style of judging; Decision of the court to revisit the conflict between federal...

  • High court declines Decalogue case.  // Christian Century;06/06/2001, Vol. 118 Issue 18, p9 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case in which an Indiana town's display of the Ten Commandments was found to be unconstitutional. Ruling of an appellate court on the case; Remarks from Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the Ten Commandments.

  • From on High. Goldberg, Jonah // National Review;7/18/2005, Vol. 57 Issue 13, p8 

    Offers a discussion about the United States Supreme Court ruling regarding the Ten Commandments. Report that the Ten Commandments can be posted on state property, but not inside public buildings; Ruling that older depictions of the Ten Commandments are less offensive than newer displays;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics