TITLE

Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude

AUTHOR(S)
Schurz, Gerhard; Weingartner, Paul
PUB. DATE
February 2010
SOURCE
Synthese;Feb2010, Vol. 172 Issue 3, p415
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem reveals a conflict between the possible-world-based content-definition and the possible-world-based likeness-definition of verisimilitude. In Sect. 2 we show that the possible-world-based content-definition violates four basic intuitions of Popper’s consequence-based content-account to verisimilitude, and therefore cannot be said to be in the spirit of Popper’s account, although this is the opinion of some prominent authors. In Sect. 3 we argue that in consequence-accounts, content-aspects and likeness-aspects of verisimilitude are not in conflict with each other, but in agreement. We explain this fact by pointing towards the deep difference between possible-world- and the consequence-accounts, which does not lie in the difference between syntactic (object-language) versus semantic (meta-language) formulations, but in the difference between ‘disjunction-of-possible-worlds’ versus ‘conjunction-of-parts’ representations of theories. Drawing on earlier work, we explain in Sect. 4 how the shortcomings of Popper’s original definition can be repaired by what we call the relevant element approach. We propose a quantitative likeness-definition of verisimilitude based on relevant elements which provably agrees with the qualitative relevant content-definition of verisimilitude on all pairs of comparable theories. We conclude the paper with a plea for consequence-accounts and a brief analysis of the problem of language-dependence (Sect. 6).
ACCESSION #
47260602

 

Related Articles

  • Verisimilitude and Belief Change for Conjunctive Theories. Cevolani, Gustavo; Crupi, Vincenzo; Festa, Roberto // Erkenntnis;Sep2011, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p183 

    Theory change is a central concern in contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between two ongoing research programs providing formal treatments of theory change: the (post-Popperian) approach to verisimilitude and the AGM theory of...

  • READ ON THE LIAR. SANDU, GABRIEL // Discusiones Filosoficas;jul-dic2011, Vol. 12 Issue 19, p277 

    In this paper I analyze Read's solution to the Liar and point out some of its problems relating it to other solutions in the literature.

  • LAS INTUICIONES Y SU PAPEL EN LA CONSTRUCCIÓN TEÓRICA. ROSELL, SERGI // Ideas y Valores;2012, Vol. 61 Issue 150, p169 

    The article reviews and evaluates the current discussion regarding the role intuitions should play in the construction of philosophical theories, while, at the same time, proposing some methodological desiderata aimed at reconciling the more reasonable demands of experimentalists with certain...

  • Truth Café. Linville, Mark // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Sep2006, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p19 

    The article focuses on the philosophical views on truth under relativism. For relativists, truth is, well, relative. What may be true to one person may not be true for others. Thus, truth cannot be imposed to another person who may have his own perspectives. Being a relativist would mean having...

  • POPPER'S SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION. Howson, Colin // Philosophical Quarterly;Apr84, Vol. 34 Issue 135, p143 

    Focuses on Popper's solution to the problem of induction. Inference to truth of universal statements; Dominance arguments of decision-theorists.

  • Truth and Provability—A Comment on Redhead. Raatikainen, Panu // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Sep2005, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p611 

    Michael Redhead's recent argument aiming to show that humanly certifiable truth outruns provability is critically evaluated. It is argued that the argument is at odds with logical facts and fails.

  • PUTTING THE HORSE BEFORE THE CART: A PRAGMATIST ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE. Augusto, Luís M. // Trans/Form/Acao;2011, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p135 

    The definition of knowledge as justified true belief is the best we presently have. However, the canonical tripartite analysis of knowledge does not do justice to it due to a Platonic conception of a priori truth that puts the cart before the horse. Within a pragmatic approach, I argue that by...

  • Three Problems for “strong” Modal Fictionalism. Nolan, Daniel // Philosophical Studies;Sep1997, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p259 

    The article analyzes three important difficulties of the theory of modality called ''Modal Fictionalism.'' These three problems, each constitute a reason for abandoning at least one version of modal fictionalism as unworkable. The essence of modal fictionalism is the claim that possible worlds...

  • Against Explanationist Skepticism Regarding Philosophical Intuitions. Pust, Joel // Philosophical Studies;Dec2001, Vol. 106 Issue 3, p227 

    Though most of analytic philosophy is based upon intuitions, some philosophers are beginning to question whether intuitions are an appropriate basis for philosophical theory. This paper responds to the arguments of some contemporary philosophers who hold that intuitions should not be treated as...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics