TITLE

The New Internet Filtering Legislation

AUTHOR(S)
Ardito, Stephanie C.
PUB. DATE
June 2001
SOURCE
Information Today;Jun2001, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses censorship and freedom of speech with respect to the Internet. Implications of the Children's Internet Protection Act of 2000 (CIPA); Challenges to the CIPA by American Library Association (ALA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU); Difficulties associated with filtering Internet content; Need for parents to monitor use of the Internet by children.
ACCESSION #
4530155

 

Related Articles

  • CIPA Overturned Due to Overblocking Protected Speech. Oder, Norman // Library Journal;6/15/2002, Vol. 127 Issue 11, p14 

    Reports on a finding by a United States federal judge panel concerning the Children's Internet Protection Act. Invalidation of the law, based on the idea that it violates freedom of speech; Effect of the decision on public libraries in the U.S.; Role of the American Library Association and the...

  • Judge Bars Enforcement of Child Protection Act. Flagg, Gordon // American Libraries;Mar99, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p10 

    Discusses information provided by the American Library Association as of March 1999. Decision of United States District Judge Lowell Reed to block enforcement of the Child Online Protection Act; Reasons for the decision; Involvement of the American Civil Liberties Union and the US Justice...

  • ACLU sues Loudoun County.  // American Libraries;Mar98, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p20 

    Reports that Loudon County, Virginia is being sued for the second time in six weeks over its rigid Internet filtering policy. The suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU); The December 22, 1997 lawsuit as filed by the People For the American Way; Similarities of both suits;...

  • CHILDREN'S INTERNET PROTECTION ACT (CIPA) RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  // Online Libraries & Microcomputers;Jun2002, Vol. 20 Issue 6/7, p2 

    Reports on the decision of the Third Circuit court of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to declare the Children's Internet Protection Act unconstitutional on May 31, 2002. Reason for declaring the act unconstitutional; Names of the judges that handed down the ruling; Reaction of the American Library...

  • CIPA Arguments Heard in Philadelphia District Court. Winter, Elisabeth // Computers in Libraries;Jun2002, Vol. 22 Issue 6, p10 

    Reports on the case brought by the Mutnomah County Public Library, the American Library Association and the American Civil Liberties Union against the United States government which challenged the constitutionality of the Children's Internet Protection Act. Issue of filtering software on the...

  • ALA, ACLU Sue To Block Net Law. Rogers, Michael; Oder, Norman // Library Journal;4/15/2001, Vol. 126 Issue 7, p16 

    Reports on lawsuits filed by the American Library Association (ALA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to overturn the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA). Description of CIPA, which ties the use of Internet filtering software to receiving funding from the United States...

  • Filter Requirement Delayed Until 2002. Rogers, Michael; Oder, Norman // Library Journal;6/15/2001, Vol. 126 Issue 11, p18 

    Reports on an extension of the time given to libraries to decide whether they will install filters and comply with the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), under an agreement made by lawyers on opposing sides of a legal challenge to the CIPA. Challenges to the law which have been made by...

  • Supreme Court Returns COPA to Appeals Court.  // American Libraries;Aug2002, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p19 

    Reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has partly upheld the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), and that unresolved free-speech questions will prevent the law from taking effect as of August 1, 2002. Reliance of COPA on community standards to identify material harmful to minors; Outlook for the...

  • Supreme Court Returns COPA to Appeals Court.  // American Libraries;Jun/Jul2002, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p20 

    Reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that unresolved free speech questions that were not addressed by the lower court prevent the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) from taking effect now. Comments of Justice Clarence Thomas, who wrote the 5-4 decision; Challenge to the law by the American...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics