Excess for excess' sake

October 2009
Money Management;10/8/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 37, p28
Trade Publication
The article focuses on the problems of most excessively paid executives in Australia. It notes that executives will have a little fear if their shareholders are empowered on generous remuneration. It states that the institutional shareholders will become proactive in curtailing excessive executive remuneration and will need to be informed about the earnings before the Productivity Commission report.


Related Articles

  • Is Benchmarking to Blame for Runaway CEO Pay? Mont, Joe // Compliance Week;Nov2012, Vol. 9 Issue 106, p60 

    The article offers information on the evaluation of the salaries of chief executive officers (CEOs), highlighting the company benchmarks. It states the study conducted at the University of Delware, reveals the use of compensation peer groups as flawed and easily manipulated. It mentions that the...

  • TV firm criticised over exec share scheme.  // Employee Benefits;Apr2006, p53 

    The article focuses on the new pay arrangements approved by SMG shareholders in June 2005 and directly cover the eight members of the television company's executive management group. The changes came after SMG was criticized for its executive pay practices in 2003 and 2004. A further 25 or so...

  • Institutional investors are dissatisfied with U.S. executive pay.  // Corporate Board;Mar/Apr2006, Vol. 27 Issue 157, p28 

    The article reports on the dissatisfaction felt by institutional investors over the way many companies determine executive pay packages in the U.S. According to a study conducted by Watson Wyatt Worldwide, 90 percent of investors think the system has overpaid executives, and 85 percent say it...

  • Factoring Innovation into Top Management's Compensation. Sethi, S. Prakash; Namiki, Nobuaki // Directors & Boards;Winter86, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p21 

    The article discusses factoring innovation into top management's compensation. Analysts observe that the prevailing compensation system in U.S. industry has produced managers who have failed to create better economic values for their stockholders and compete in the global economy. They suggest a...

  • MANAGEMENT ORIENTAT SPRE ACÅ¢IONARI (II). RUSU, Paul // Review of Management & Economic Engineering;2013, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p129 

    Shareholder and stakeholder orientation is the subject of a debate in research theory. Any business student will have this dilemma: who is more important: employees, and other parties like clients or the end results - the shareholders? There are different perspectives when paying managers from a...

  • In whose interest?  // Pensions & Investments;4/17/2006, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p10 

    The article focuses on a joint study of mutual fund proxy voting on executive compensation. The findings should wake up investors, especially 401(k) and other defined contribution plan sponsors and investors using mutual funds, to their fiduciary obligation. The study helps show which mutual...

  • Special Compensation Arrangements with Dissident Director Nominees. Powers, Ted; Bell, Jeffery // Venulex Legal Summaries;2014Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the special compensation arrangements of certain activist shareholders in proxy contests with dissident director nominees. The criticisms of commentators on compensation arrangements are cited, such as creating incentives to incite such arrangements and sacrificing...

  • CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AGENCY AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. Hamill, Philip; Ward, Anne Marie; Wylie, Judith // Accountancy Ireland;Apr2011, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p68 

    The article offers academic view on the extent to which changes in corporate governance are likely to impact executive compensation in Ireland. It examines the potential of the executive compensation schemes to effectively align executive wealth with shareholder wealth. It discusses the impact...

  • Effort to rein in pay gathering steam. Elstein, Aaron // Crain's New York Business;3/12/2007, Vol. 23 Issue 11, p1 

    The article reports that nearly 60 leading companies will be asked by their sharholders to sign on to a seemingly straightforward proposal about CEO compensation. According to the proposal, top executives should get supersized pay only if they produce supersized financial results. Even as the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics