TITLE

Rowland Panel: Questions & Answers

PUB. DATE
February 2001
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2001, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1383
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents a panel discussion on environmental policy in the United States. Benefits gained from the Clean Air Act; Reason for the lack of progress on controlling greenhouse gas emissions; Industry attitudes toward different types of global climate change policies.
ACCESSION #
4447895

 

Related Articles

  • You've got to be choking.  // Ecologist;Apr2002, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p12 

    Presents information on a report about the new source review (NSR) program of the Clean Air Act in the U.S. Changes proposed by the U.S. administration on the NSR program; Environmental impact of the proposal.

  • Philippines tackles air pollution. Wallerstein, Claire // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);03/13/99, Vol. 318 Issue 7185, p689 

    Announces the possible passage of clean air legislation in the Philippines. Levels of lead in the air in Manila; What the bill includes; Remarks from Doctor Steve Tamplin, regional adviser on environmental health of the World Health Organization.

  • Environmental Policy.  // Slovakia Country Review;2012, p189 

    The article provides an overview of the environmental protection and regulation in Slovakia including law of the sea, air pollution, and climate change.

  • Climate showdown.  // Hill;4/1/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 38, p30 

    The author reflects on the bill proposed by U.S. Energy Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and U.S. Energy and Environment subcommittee Chairman Edward Markey that requests 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emission by 2050 in the U.S.

  • SMOG BUSTERS.  // State Legislatures;Feb2006, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p10 

    The article deals with the legislation adopted by the California Air Resources Board that bars cruise ships from burning refuse within three miles of shore in February 2006. Reducing pollution caused by burning trash, ranging from food to rags, will reduce cancer risks and could save as many as...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND NATIONAL SECURITY: CAN EXISTING EXEMPTIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS PRESERVE DOD TRAINING AND OPERATIONAL PREROGATIVES WITHOUT NEW LEGISLATION? Willard, E. G.; Zimmerman, Tom; Bee, Eric // Air Force Law Review;2004, Vol. 54, p65 

    Describes the existing national security exemptions in environmental laws in the U.S. and examples of their use. Regulatory requirements for biannual inventories of hazardous wastes generated; Concerns for national security at Department of Defense facilities; Presidential exemption for Clean...

  • Burning Questions. Kriz, Margaret // National Journal;4/6/2002, Vol. 34 Issue 14, p976 

    Discusses the plan of U.S. President George W. Bush to eliminate several major pollution-control provisions of the 1970 Clean Air Act as they apply to the electric-power industry. Argument raised by the Bush administration against the 1970 law; View of environmentalists on the president's...

  • Rise above government's Part L botches. Booth, Robert // Building Design;2/10/2006, Issue 1708, p11 

    The article comments on the government's move of botching the country's drive to cut carbon emissions by allowing thousands of homes, offices, and factories to go on belching out carbon at a rate in Great Britain. The government has declared that buildings submitted for regulatory approval ahead...

  • EPA Launches Performance Track Program. Kreuzer, Heidi // Pollution Engineering;Sep2000, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p11 

    Focuses on the introduction of program by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to evaluate the performance of environmental policies of businesses in the country. Details of the program; Objectives to encourage policy compliance.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics