TITLE

Supreme Court Changes Vehicle Search Rules

AUTHOR(S)
Hodsdon, Richard
PUB. DATE
September 2009
SOURCE
Sheriff;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 61 Issue 5/6, p68
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case where a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court to change the operation of law enforcement during search incidents in the arrest of persons in motor vehicles in the U.S. It notes that the policies, procedures, and practices of law enforcement must change. It mentions that the Supreme Court is not restricting law enforcement officials to impound vehicles and conduct inventory search in appropriate cases.
ACCESSION #
44321808

 

Related Articles

  • The Olmsteadian Seizure Clause: The Fourth Amendment and the Seizure of Intangible Property. OHM, PAUL // Stanford Technology Law Review;2008, Issue 2, p1 

    The article focuses on several U.S. supreme court cases related to the seizure of intangible property, and discusses the constitutional values of the Seizure Clause as well as the Search Clause of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It discusses the cases such as Olmstead v. United...

  • THORNTON v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Thornton v. United States, case number 03-5165 argued on March 31, 2004 and decided on May 24, 2004. Police officer Deion Nichols found narcotics and weapon in the vehicle of petitioner Marcus Thornton. Thorton was charged with...

  • Searches and Stale Law, Plus a Look at Coming Attractions. Stadnyk, Sophia M. // State & Local Law News;Summer2008, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p12 

    The article discusses the appealed case concerning the Supreme Court's decision to an issue on the admissibility of evidence which was obtained inherent to a lawful arrest. In considering the decision of Virginia court and re-appreciation of the facts of the case, the Supreme Court reversed and...

  • FOURTH AMENDMENT--DETENTION OF OCCUPANTS DURING A PREMISES SEARCH: THE WINTER OF DISCONTENT FOR PROBABLE CAUSE. Vawrinek, Jeffrey J. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1981, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p1246 

    The article examines the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Michigan v. Summers in which it undertook a major dismantling of the probable cause requirement of the fourth amendment. In Summers, the Court widened the gap between the once equivalent fourth amendment terms of reasonableness and...

  • GEORGIA v. RANDOLPH: CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Georgia v. Randolph, case number 04-1067, argued on November 8, 2005 and decided on March 22, 2006. The validity of consent given by one occupant in his residence for search or entry of the police is reviewed by the Supreme Court....

  • GEORGIA, PETITIONER v. SCOTT FITZ RANDOLPH: ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Georgia v. Randolph, case number 04-1067, argued on November 8, 2005 and decided on March 22, 2006. The dispute between petitioner Scott Randolph and his wife Janet Randolph is presented in the case in the context of the Fourth...

  • High court voids steel seizure.  // America;6/14/1952, Vol. 87 Issue 11, p287 

    The author reflects on the oral arguments in the steel seizure case, Youngstown Co. v. Sawyer, nullified by the Supreme Court in the U.S. The author explores an argument, contending that the power that the President claimed was authorized not by an act of Congress or by any provision in the...

  • DUSENBERY v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    This article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Dusenbery v. U.S., case number 00-6567, argued on October 29, 2001 and decided on January 8, 2002. In vacating and remanding, the Sixth Circuit held that the motion of the petitioner for the return of all the property and funds...

  • FOURTH AMENDMENT--REQUIRING PROBABLE CAUSE FOR SEARCHES AND SEIZURES UNDER THE PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE. Romero, Elsie // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1988, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p763 

    This article focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Arizona versus Hicks which deals with requiring probable cause for searches and seizures under the plain view doctrine. The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals against arbitrary and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics