TITLE

New Evidence for New Arguments: Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections

AUTHOR(S)
Goldstein, Ken; Freedman, Paul
PUB. DATE
November 2000
SOURCE
Journal of Politics;Nov2000, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p1087
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
We present an individual-level analysis of the effects of campaign advertising on vote choice in the 1996 Senate elections. Drawing on a unique data set that merges the 1996 National Election Study with detailed satellite tracking data showing when, where, and how many times every Senate campaign ad was aired in each of the nation's top media markets, we develop an alternative measure of media exposure and a different way of measuring the effect of campaign spending. We use this new approach to address long-standing questions about the effect of political advertising and the role of campaign spending in congressional elections. This cleaner measure yields results contrary to some of the conventional wisdom on the effect of campaign spending.(n1)
ACCESSION #
4335005

 

Related Articles

  • ELECTION WATCH: THE RACES TO KEEP AN EYE ON.  // Advertising Age;10/25/2010, Vol. 81 Issue 38, p4 

    The article discusses various election campaigns for the U.S. Congressional elections of 2010 and the election campaign for Governor of California, assessing the campaign funds in each race.

  • Healthcare groups back Republicans.  // Modern Healthcare;11/7/94, Vol. 24 Issue 45, p14 

    Reports on health and insurance groups' financial support for Republicans during the Senate campaigns in August and September 1994. Previous preference for Democrats; Leading contributors among health and insurance groups; Leading recipient.

  • DCCC chairman says Dems done grieving. D'Aprile, Shane // Hill;2/17/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 21, p21 

    The article reports on fund raising by the U.S. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) for the 2012 U.S. House elections.

  • Will money matter? Cook Jr., Charles E. // International Economy;Sep/Oct96, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p69 

    Focuses on the role of campaign funds in successful congressional bids in the United States. Expenditures of Republicans and Democrats; Strategies of the parties in their political advertising; Contributions of organized labor in their political spending.

  • The house that Jack built. Elvin, John // Insight on the News;12/02/96, Vol. 12 Issue 45, p35 

    Reports on the results of the study conducted by the Federal Election Commission on the fund raising and spending of congressional candidates. Amount of money raised by House candidates; Figure for contributions coming from the Senate candidates.

  • FEC panel should fix free speech. Samples, John // Clarendon Enterprise (TX);8/24/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 36, p2 

    The author reflects on a proposal to the U.S. Federal Election Commission which would allow grassroots organizations and pro-life groups to run advertising lobbying their fellow citizens. The change would set out conditions under which groups could lobby the U.S. Congress without violating the...

  • The heavy cost of free mailshots.  // Marketing Week;2/24/2000, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p3 

    Editorial. Comments on the Britain House of Lords' debate over whether London, England mayoral candidates should be armed with their own marketing and advertising budget. Two reasons why the government objects to a budget; Arguments for giving a budget to the candidates.

  • The Influence of Media Expenditure and Allocation Strategies in Congressional Advertising Campaigns. Weaver-Lariscy, Ruth Ann; Tinkham, Spencer E. // Journal of Advertising;1987, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p13 

    A survey of Congressional candidates conducted shortly after the 1982 elections showed that advertising media expenditure and allocation strategies vary significantly among types of campaigns: incumbent, challenger, and open-race. The results demonstrated that these three are in fact different...

  • Campaign Finance: Congressional Inquiries and Related Costs: AIMD-98-316R. Barreaux, Theodore C. // GAO Reports;9/29/1998, p1 

    Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on data it obtained from executive branch agencies on finance inquiries made by Congress, focusing on gathering data on the: (1) number of inquiries received from October 1, 1996, through March 31, 1998, that related to campaign...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics