TITLE

Darwin and Mendel: evolution and genetics

AUTHOR(S)
Bizzo, Nelio; El-Hani, Charbel N.
PUB. DATE
June 2009
SOURCE
Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology);Summer2009, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p108
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Many studies have shown that students' understanding of evolution is low and some sort of historical approach would be necessary in order to allow students to understand the theory of evolution. It is common to present Mendelian genetics to high school students prior to Biological Evolution, having in mind historical and epistemological assumptions regarding connections between the works of Gregor Mendel and Charles Darwin. It is often said that Darwin 'lacked' a theory of heredity and, therefore, he had not been able to produce the synthetic theory of evolution himself. Thus, schools could provide a prior basis for heredity, so that students could begin to study evolution with a proper background in genetics. We intend to review some research on the history of biology, attempting to show that, even if Darwin had had notice of Mendel's works -- which we think he did -- he would not have changed his views on heredity. We examine this belief and its possible origins, offer some considerations about Darwin's views on heredity, including his knowledge of the 3:1 ratio, the consequences for the work on Nature of Science (NOS), and finally give five reasons to consider alternative possibilities for curriculum development.
ACCESSION #
43226128

 

Related Articles

  • Current debates on the origin of species. McBride, Paul D.; Gillman, Len N.; Wright, Shane D. // Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology);Summer2009, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p104 

    Students are rarely presented with a diversity of viewpoints about evolution and its mechanisms. The historical background to evolution normally suffices: Darwin's journey on The Beagle, his concepts of natural selection and common descent, and an outline of Mendel's experiments. With...

  • Mendel and the Path to Genetics: Portraying Science as a Social Process. Kampourakis, Kostas // Science & Education;Feb2013, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p293 

    Textbook descriptions of the foundations of Genetics give the impression that besides Mendel's no other research on heredity took place during the nineteenth century. However, the publication of the Origin of Species in 1859, and the criticism that it received, placed the study of heredity at...

  • Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Darwin and Genetics. Charlesworth, Brian; Charlesworth, Deborah // Genetics;Nov2009, Vol. 183 Issue 3, p757 

    Darwin's theory of natural selection lacked an adequate account of inheritance, making it logically incomplete. We review the interaction between evolution and genetics, showing how, unlike Mendel, Darwin's lack of a model of the mechanism of inheritance left him unable to interpret his own data...

  • What Would Have Happened if Darwin Had Known Mendel (or Mendel's Work)? Lorenzano, Pablo // History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p3 

    The question posed by the title is usually answered by saying that the "synthesis" between the theory of evolution by natural selection and classical genetics, which took place in 1930s-40s, would have taken place much earlier if Darwin had been aware of Mendel and his work. What is more, it...

  • Gregor J. Mendel - Genetics Founding Father. SCHWARZBACH, ERIK; SMÝKAL, PETR; DOSTÁL, ONDŘEJ; JARKOVSKÁ, MICHAELA; VALOVÁ, SIMONA // Czech Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding;2014, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p43 

    Mendel's impact on science is overwhelming. Although based on the number of scientific papers he published he might be considered a meteorologist, his most significant contribution is his study of plant hybrids. This single work puts Mendel on a par with Darwin's evolutionary theory and...

  • Mendel's opposition to evolution and to Darwin. Bishop, B.E. // Journal of Heredity;May/Jun96, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p205 

    Focuses on Gregor Mendel's opposition to the concept of biological evolution and to Charles Darwin. Antievolutionary content of Mendel's `Pisum' paper; Contradictions between Mendel's and Darwin's theories.

  • The extent of Charles Darwin's knowledge of Mendel. Sclater, Andrew // Journal of Biosciences;Jun2006, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p191 

    The author comments on the extent of biologist Charles Darwin's knowledge of geneticist Gregor Mendel. The articles seeks to correct claims that Darwin is familiar with Mendel's work. It also aims to dispel speculations that results of Mendel's studies held meaning in Darwin's thought. According...

  • The Genetic Revolution.  // National Geographic;Nov2004, Vol. 206 Issue 5, p32 

    Traces a brief history of evolution theory. Discovery of the fundamentals of genetics by Austrian monk Gregor Mendel in Charles Darwin's time; X-ray diffraction photograph by Rosalind Franklin in 1952, which helped James Watson and Francis Crick discover DNA's double-helical structure; Usage of...

  • Are Genes Real? Comfort, Nathaniel C. // Natural History;Jun2001, Vol. 110 Issue 5, p28 

    Presents a brief history on the development of scientific knowledge on genes. Information on the hereditary theory designed by scientist Gregor Mendel; Details on the theory of pangenesis conducted by Charles Darwin; Findings of George Beadle, a geneticist, and Edward Tatum, a chemist, on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics