TITLE

THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS RIGHT OF COMPANIONSHIP BETWEEN A PARENT AND HIS OR HER ADULT CHILD: EXAMINATION OF A CIRCUIT SPLIT

AUTHOR(S)
Weinberg, Meir
PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
New England Law Review;Winter2009, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p271
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a circuit court contention over the due process right of companionship between a parent and his or her adult child in the U.S. Fourteenth Amendment. A brief overview of the history of substantive due process rights in the country is presented. It recommends finding a constitutional right of companionship between the parties involved. Also noted is the necessity for the Supreme Court to tackle the issue sufficiently.
ACCESSION #
42730457

 

Related Articles

  • THE RIGHT TO CONTRACT AS A CIVIL RIGHT. WEST, ROBIN // St. Thomas Law Review;Summer2014, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p551 

    The article focuses on civil rights in contract issues such as the right to contract. Topics discussed include the right to contract involved in the sale, purchase, or rental of our property, the U.S Family and Medical Leave Act as well as the Affordable Care Act, the "self-sovereignty"...

  • ORIGINAL INTENT AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: INTO THE BLACK HOLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. FINKELMAN, PAUL // Chicago-Kent Law Review;2014, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p1019 

    The article discusses the history of the U.S Fourteenth Amendment and the intent of this complicated and complex Amendment. Topics discussed include American legal historian William E. Nelson's book on the Fourteenth Amendment, Nelson's discussion on interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by...

  • Who's Afraid of Original Meaning? THOMAS, GEORGE // Policy Review;Dec2010/Jan2011, Issue 164, p75 

    The article discusses a question in U.S. constitutional law involving the judicial philosophy of originalism, the 14th amendment, and a U.S. Supreme Court case from 1873 regarding laws about slaughterhouses in New Orleans, Louisiana. A clause in the 14th amendment which cites the privileges and...

  • Protecting the Liberty of Indigent Civil Contemnors in the Absence of a Right to Appointed Counsel. FIDDELMAN, JACOB R. // Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems;Summer2013, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p431 

    In 2011, the United States Supreme Court held in Turner v. Rogers that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require the government to provide appointed counsel in civil contempt actions -- despite the possibility that a contemnor can be jailed indefinitely for continuing...

  • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER AND ORIGINALISM. Solum, Lawrence B. // Northwestern University Law Review;2009 Special Issue, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p923 

    In this article, the author examines the relationship between originalist constitutional theory and judicial practice in the context of the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller. It explores the evolution of contemporary originalist theory to contextualize the...

  • THE CONSTITUTIONAL HALL PASS: RETHINKING THE GAP IN § 1983 LIABILITY THAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS HAVE ENJOYED SINCE DESHANEY. Sanford, Jeff // Washington University Law Review;2014, Vol. 91 Issue 6, p1633 

    The article offers information on the significance of immunity claims for students against the misconduct committed by public schools and their officials that violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process liability. It discusses the judicial decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of...

  • THE FORGOTTEN CHILDREN OF THE FOSTER CARE SYSTEM: MAKING A CASE FOR THE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT STANDARD. KOEHLER, ANDREA // Golden Gate University Law Review;May2014, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p221 

    The author argues foster care caseworkers in America could be held liable for allegedly failing to carry out their duty to protect foster children if the courts in the U.S. adopted a "professional judgment" standard. A deliberate indifference standard is addressed in relation to cases involving...

  • THE ABSENTEE POST-CONVICTION CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS. Hansen, Danielle M. // Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p563 

    The article offers information on the judicial decision of City Court Of Middletown, New York, in the case of People v. Zowaski, taken on January 24, 2011. It informs that the Court addressed the need for changes in traditional policies of punishment and judicial sentencing. It discusses...

  • THE PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT THEORY OF MARRIAGE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS. Raley, Gage // Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law;2011, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p133 

    Proponents of gay marriage have long argued that laws banning the practice violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution and their counterparts in state constitutions. They contend that same-sex couples have the same fundamental right to marry as...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics