TITLE

Court rejects hospital's attempt to limit admitting privileges

PUB. DATE
June 2009
SOURCE
Contemporary OB/GYN;Jun2009, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case, published in "American Medical News," wherein a state trial court in Arkansas determined that it was improper for a hospital to use a credentialing policy that denied admitting privileges to physicians with interest in their competitors. The case involved Baptist Health's decision to implement an economic conflict-of-interest policy in 2003. This resulted in the loss of privileges for 12 staff cardiologists who owned the specialty facility Arkansas Heart Hospital.
ACCESSION #
41556514

 

Related Articles

  • When a Patient Leaves Against Medical Advice. FLEETER, THOMAS B. // AAOS Now;Nov2012, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p35 

    The article discusses the legal consequences after patients leave against medical advice (AMA) from a hospital. It is stated that if a patient leaves AMA after a dispute with the physician, courts may view the physician as liable for premature discharge; and the plaintiff is often successful...

  • news in brief.  // Pulse;8/6/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 31, p4 

    Presents trends and developments affecting general practitioners (GP) in Great Britain. Results of the Healthcare Commission reports showing GP removing patients removing patients who make complaints; Decision of the government to deploy home fecal occult blood testing kits to minimize the...

  • Failure to diagnose infection after delivery.  // Contemporary OB/GYN;May2007, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p42 

    The article reports on the lawsuit in New York filed by a 40-year-old woman against her physicians. The lawsuit claimed that the physicians were negligent in diagnosing her group-A streptococcus infection. The patient claimed that she should not have been discharged from the hospital because of...

  • Delay in treating urinary tract trauma. Collins, Dawn // Contemporary Urology;Feb2002, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p60 

    Presents a medical malpractice case concerning a urologist and older patient at a Tennessee hospital. Reason behind the hospital admission of the patient; Complications that resulted from patient catheterization; Outcome of the lawsuit filed against the urologist.

  • N.Y. county's 'play-or-pay' mandate pre-empted by ERISA, judge rules. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;7/23/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 30, p4 

    This article reports that a federal court has invalidated the two-year-old Suffolk County, New York, play-or-pay health care mandate that requires certain retailers to provide a prescribed level of health insurance to their nonmanagement workers. The Suffolk County law is pre-empted by the...

  • Pilot crashes. Becker, Cinda // Modern Healthcare;4/19/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 16, p6 

    Focuses on the decision of U.S. District Judge John Bissell in Newark, New Jersey to place a permanent injunction on the bonus-payment demonstration project launched in January 2004 by the Center for Measurement of Science and the New Jersey Hospital Association. Lawsuit filed by four hospitals...

  • Canadian court decisions highlight obscure disability benefit rules. Gonzalez, Gloria // Business Insurance;5/29/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 22, p21 

    The article focuses on court decisions which highlight some obscure disability-related liabilities facing Canadian employers as of May 2006. In two cases, courts have held employers responsible for providing disability benefits for an unspecified period after terminating employees, highlighting...

  • CAN YOU DECIDE THE CASE OF THE WOULD-BE MEMBER?  // Labor Law Journal;Apr51, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p278 

    The article presents information about the fact that can one decide the case of the would-be member. In a company which had a Quarter Century Club for old-timers, a man who had completed his twenty-five years of service-with one interruption-wanted to join the club. Membership had other than...

  • FOCUS ON DISCLOSURE AND MISREPRESENTATION. Hesse, Katherine A.; Ehrens, Doris R. MacKenzie // Benefits Quarterly;1998 Second Quarter, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p86 

    This section provides an update on several court rulings concerning various employee benefits-related cases in the U.S. as of June 1998. In Jane Doe v. Travelers Insurance Co., decisions of out-of-court decision makers with discretionary authority are reviewed using an arbitrary and capricious...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics