TITLE

Crime and Delinquency

AUTHOR(S)
Sutton, Christine J.
PUB. DATE
December 2000
SOURCE
Federal Probation;Dec2000, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p82
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the electronic monitoring (EM) program as an alternative to incarceration. Inspiration of the EM program developed by Judge Jack Love; Analysis of the range of EM program completion success rate; Factors affecting participant selection process; Discussion of recidivism in connection with EM programs.
ACCESSION #
4115116

 

Related Articles

  • Is Electronic Monitoring Equivalent to Imprisonment?  // Journal of Offender Monitoring;2011, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein Brian Horsman who was charged by the State of Illinois with felony driving with revoked license has requested the court that he be placed on electronic home monitoring as a means of fulfilling the statutory requirement that he be sentenced to imprisonment.

  • The Influence of Demographic Factors on the Experience of House Arrest. Payne, Brian K.; Gainey, Randy R. // Federal Probation;Dec2002, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p64 

    Focuses on a study which examined the way different types of offenders responds to the experience of being placed on house arrest with electronic monitoring. Review of literature on the incarceration of minorities; Consequences of house arrest with electronic monitoring; Perceptions about the...

  • Electronic Monitoring.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;May/Jun2011, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p25 

    The article discusses a court ruling which indicates that electronic home monitoring is not a kind of imprisonment that can fulfill the statutory requirement of a felony.

  • The Prison Journal. Torres, Sam // Federal Probation;Jun2005, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p47 

    The article examines the results of the study "The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders Released from Jail or Prison: Safety, Control and Comparisons to the Incarceration Experience," by Brian K. Payne and Randy R. Gainey, published in the December 2004 issue of "The Prison Journal." Electronic...

  • "PURPOSE VERSUS PRACTICE IN THE USE OF ELECTRONICALLY MONITORED HOME CONFINEMENT.". Quinn, James F.; Holman, John E. // American Journal of Criminal Justice;Fall1990, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p157 

    This paper explores differences between the stated purpose and actual practice of electronically monitored home confinement as a prison-diversion strategy. Methods and data are triangulated to examine the difference between the stated purposes of electronic monitoring and its actual usage in two...

  • A Call for Evidence-Based Policy. Matthew, DeMichele; Payne, Brian; Button, Deeanna // State News (Council of State Governments);Jan2007, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p26 

    The article assesses the effectiveness of electronic monitoring devices for sex offenders as mandated by the Adam Walsh Act in the U.S. Government officials demand for increased sentences, longer parole and probation periods and other strategies to punish such criminals. The cost of the...

  • What Others Have to Say About Offender Fees for EM.  // Journal of Offender Monitoring;Winter/Spring2004, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p16 

    The article offers information on organizations that deal with rising cost of electronic monitoring. It presents their opinions on the availability of offender fee programs as a way to offset the costs. They include Carl Wickland, executive director of American Probation and Parole Association...

  • Foreword. Cadigan, Timothy P. // Federal Probation;Sep2001, Vol. 65 Issue 2, pN.PAG 

    Presents an overview of the role of technology in the field of community corrections. Discussion of this role in the September 2001 issue of "Federal Probation" magazine; Networking of the federal probation and pretrial services system to ensure criminal justice system efficiency.

  • Electronic Monitoring: Positive Intervention Strategies. Gable, Ralph Kirkland; Gable, Robert S. // Federal Probation;Jun2005, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p21 

    The article focuses on the efficacy of electronic monitoring (EM) as a form of intensive supervision of non-violent offenders who appear to present little threat to the community in the U.S. In 2005, about 20 percent of community-based supervision in the country involves electronic monitoring...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics