TITLE

Supreme Court Cases

AUTHOR(S)
Kil, Sophia Y.
PUB. DATE
November 2000
SOURCE
FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Nov2000, Vol. 69 Issue 11, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Offers a look at several United States Supreme Court cases. `Bond v. United States'; `Illinois v. Wardlow'; `Florida v. J.L.; `Dickerson v. United States.'
ACCESSION #
3848231

 

Related Articles

  • Before the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2000, Vol. 3 Issue 6, p186 

    Focuses on Charles Thomas Dickerson versus United States case. Arguments on behalf of Dickerson; Argument on behalf of the lower court decision on the case.

  • Miranda v. Dickerson.  // Christian Science Monitor;4/19/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 103, p10 

    Views the pros and cons if the Supreme court case Dickerson v. United States decides that police and courts should have more liberty to use criminal confessions.

  • Bond v. United States.  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents the United States Supreme Court case of Bond v. the US, which was decided in April of 2000. How the case was brought by Steven Dewayne Bond after he was arrested for trying to transport illegal drugs across the Texas border; Bond's argument that his bags were illegally searched by...

  • THE COURT SHOULD HAVE REMAINED SILENT: WHY THE COURT ERRED IN DECIDING DICKERSON V. UNITED STATES. Chemerinsky, Erwin // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Nov2000, Vol. 149 Issue 1, p287 

    Contends that the United States Supreme Court's decision in 'Dickerson v. United States' will be remembered for its emphatic reaffirmation of 'Miranda v. Arizona' case. Importance of the 'Dickerson' case for its importance in defining the relationship between the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court...

  • Should the Supreme Court Dump the Miranda Rules? Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;10/23/99, Vol. 31 Issue 43, p3031 

    Deals with the United States (US) issue on the Miranda rules or the rights of crime suspects which emanated from the decision in the 1966 Supreme Court case, Miranda versus Arizona. Evidence of the rules' popularity; Criticisms on the rules; Argument of Justice Byron R. White on the rules;...

  • RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS AS A CONDITION FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN TENNESSEE. SELVA, LANCE H.; SHULMAN, WILLIAM L.; REID, STEPHEN // Law & Psychology Review;2015/2016, Vol. 40, p81 

    In this article, the authors discusses false confessions induced by police and the methods to address this issue in Tennessee. Topics discussed include the need to record police interrogations, the need for legislative reforms to implement laws related to this, and a research by Thomas Sullivan,...

  • Hands-Off Policy. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Jun2000, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p36 

    Deals with the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court's position regarding privacy of bags that passengers carry with them from police and drug enforcement search in the Bond versus U.S. case. Comments from civil libertarians on the Supreme Court's decision; Coverage of the Supreme Court's privacy...

  • IDENTIFYING AND (RE)FORMULATING PROPHYLACTIC RULES, SAFE HARBORS, AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Klein, Susan R. // Michigan Law Review;Mar2001, Vol. 99 Issue 5, p1030 

    Answers the conundrum of the Miranda versus Arizona case decision to justify other similar cases. Definition of the terms constitutional prophylactic rule, constitutional safe harbor rule and constitutional incidental right; Suggestion on the benefits of defining constitutional terms;...

  • Miranda Revisited. Petrowski, Thomas D. // FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Aug2001, Vol. 70 Issue 8, p25 

    Examined the decision of the United States Supreme Court on the case of Charles T. Dickerson for bank robbery. Evaluation of the admissibility of incriminating statements made by the accused; Discussion on voluntary confessions; Details of his case; Civil liability of federal lawsuits.

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics